64ef4047c0037ae33d4b4d43475a66edIntroduction

This section isn't part of the original intended work or essential to it, it is rather an extension of the knowledge already mentioned, it is included to resolve the question, to what extent did muslim scholars discuss the quantum nature of the universe, and to further remove the misinformation surrounding the origins of Islamic Intellectual thought. In answering the question one scholars work is presented but it shouldn't be thought of as the total extent of the matter.

In the works of scholars throughout Islamic history, such as Imam al Ghazali and Imam Ibn al Arabi, they have touched upon the Quantum structure of the Universe. All muslim scholars read the same Quran, studied the same Sunnah, Hadith literature along with the Seerah (biography of the prophet) to draw knowledge from. The Ash’ari and Maturidi Aqeedah speaks about the nature of the quantum world but some scholars took this further and conceptualized the entire quantum structure of the universe from what the Quran and Sunnah have said.

Imam Suhrawardi

One scholar in particular who's work was rejected because of its inaccuracies was Imam Shihab al-Din al-Suhrawardi (d.1193, Imam al Ghazali d.1111), he was a Shafi‘i Sunni scholar and possibly followed the Ashari Aqeedah as he speaks about the Aradh (accidents) and Jawhar (substances) in his works. We are presenting parts of his work here to clarify what has been said about him and to expand peoples understanding of classical islamic thought on the quantum world. The Islamic sources for his work are provided as this has been something western academics have intellectually blundered. I should add again his work was not considered Orthodox because it was assumed to be unique, speaking about the quantum world, something scholars rarely do, but it is clearly derived from the Quran and Ahadith, as he himself was an Orthodox Scholar (Sunni). 

In 1183, Imam Suhrawardi arrived in Aleppo (Syria), the year Salah al Deen (d.1193) conquered the city and handed it’s governance over to his son al-Zahir (d.1216), who the Imam befriended. In 1186, he completed his most significant work, “Kitab Hikmat al-Ishraq”. Hikmat al Ishraq literally means the “Wisdom of Illumination”, referring to the light Allah created the Universe, Angels, Pen and Intellect from, mentioned in the Quran and Sunnah. The title of the work gives the literal intention behind the Imam’s work because in Islam wisdom is from Allah, “And whosoever is granted wisdom is indeed granted abundant good”(2:269). 

Because all Muslims scholars drew on the same sources we can understand how there ideas would seem similar to the layman, but be vastly different to the expert. In light of this the Imams work teaches similar ideas to what Imam al Ghazali said about the structure of the universe and what Imam al Suyuti (d.1505) said Angels are, in relation to their role in this universe, neither scholars having anything to do with Imam Suhrawardi’s work which only found limited acceptance. The only similarity is that each scholar followed the Shafii Madhhab of Fiqh (Legal School of Thought), meaning they would have employed the same rules (Usul) for interpretation and applied the same Usul al Fiqh (Principles of Jurisprudence) to the Quran and Sunnah, they all practiced Tasawwuf, and possibly they all followed the same Ashari Aqeedah.

Imam Suhrawardi’s ideas where rejected because of the inaccuracies of his other sources, but through them he developed his own unique theories regarding the quantum world. Besides the Quran and Sunnah, he drew upon the works Zoroaster, a Prophet Allah had sent to persia more than a thousand of years earlier, and Plato, who like Imam Suhrawardi relied upon the same prophets revelations. In using Plato’s works, because of the sources Plato relied upon, it can be understood, as he said himself, he was seeking the knowledge Allah gave to the prophet Zoroaster. He was also a critique of Ibn Sina’s theories and teachings (like Imam al Ghazali) among other Ancient philosophers. 

The Imam, although used the works of Philosophers rejected Philosophy, something he made clear in much of his writings for essentially the same reasons as Imam al Ghazali in his Incoherence of the Philosophers. 

The Imam was attempting to understand the scientific nature of Allah’s light in the universe throughout his works. Imam Suhrawardi, who was of persian origin like the prophet, and in his Hikmat al-Ishraq states why he considered the teachings of Zoroaster important:

“There was among the ancient Persians a community of people guided by God (Zoroastrians) who thus walked the true way, worthy Sages, with no resemblance to the Magi (Dualists, philosophers). It is their precious philosophy of Light, the same as that to which the mystical experience of Plato and his predecessors bear witness, that we have revived in our book called Hikmat al-'Ishraq, and I have had no precursor in the way of such project”. 

he said elsewhere this constitutes a superior means of accessing the luminous reality and the divine realm of Haq, (understanding the true state of something, whether good for you or harmful or something else).

He considered Plato and his Greek predecessors Gnostics, and not simply philosophers as the modern ascription, because in reality you cant be a philosopher and a gnostic at the same time, and relied upon his writings which where based on the teachings of the Prophet Zoroaster. He classified the learned men according to their respective merits in discursive (philosophy) and intuitive (Gnostic) knowledge. As Imam Ibn al Arabi explained in his works, the Imam similarly said, Prophetic knowledge relies on the functions of the faculty of (the minds inner eye) imagination, its role in the particularization of universal truths (the hearts ability to encompass the larger reality of something). Prophecy becomes the ‘direct’ experience of the world of lights (Nur Allah). The Imam speaks about the ability of mans inner eye to see Barzakh and scientifically explains this ability of the Prophets and the Awliya, to access the unseen realms where quantum beings (Angels and Jinn) and forms (Jannah and Jahanam) already exist. Such people are either commissioned or uncommissioned by Allah to receive and transmit his message, the prophets being those who are the most perfect in passing on Allah’s revelation.

Imam Ali said “The vision of the eye is limited; the vision of the heart transcends all barriers of time and space” to be succinct, this saying of Imam Ali sums up everything Imam Suhrawardi was trying to explain in scientific terms throughout all his works, regarding the vision of the heart and its light, in doing so he relied on the works of people who had gained this vision, the people of Gnosis. 

The Messenger of Allah (saws) said: “Amongst the nation of Bani Israel who lived before you, there were men who used to be inspired with guidance though they were not Prophets, and if there is any such person amongst my followers, it is Umar.”(Bukhari)

And he said: "Among the nations before you there were Muhaddathun (people who were inspired, though they were not Prophets). And if there is any such a person among my followers, it would be 'Umar" (Agreed upon)

Umar (r.a) was given the gift of true inspiration which is the characteristic of Allah’s Friends named kashf or "unveiling." The prophet (saws) said "Allah has engraved truth on the tongue of `Umar and his heart" and "If there were a Prophet after me verily it would be `Umar." 

Imam al-Tirmidhi said that according to Ibn `Uyayna "spoken to" (muhaddathun) means "made to understand" (mufahhamun), while in his narration Muslim added: "Ibn Wahb explained ‘spoken to’ as ‘inspired’ (mulham)." This is the majority’s opinion according to Ibn Hajar who said: "‘Spoken to’ means ‘by the angels’." 

Imam al-Nawawi and Ibn Hajar said respectively in Sharh Sahih Muslim and Fath al-Bari: The scholars have differed concerning "spoken to." Ibn Wahb said it meant "inspired" (mulham). It was said also: "Those who are right, and when they give an opinion it is as if they were spoken to, and then they give their opinion. It was said also: "The angels speak to them..." Bukhari said: "Truth comes from their tongues." This hadith contains a confirmation of the miracles of the saints (karamat al-awliya). The one among [Muslims] who is "spoken to," if his existence is ascertained (he is Siddiq), what befalls him is not used as basis for a legal judgment, rather he is obliged to evaluate it with the Qur’an, and if it conforms to it or to the Sunna, he acts upon it, otherwise he leaves it.

The Imam in his work criticizes philosophers like Aristotle and says regarding his own work Hikmat al Anwar (The Wisdom of Lights) ‘only direct experience guarantees acquisition of true knowledge’, not philosophy.

This all originates from the fact He practiced Tassawwuf and this has been the way of Islam from its first days, in fact those specific words can be traced back to the earliest Islamic scholars. Imam al Ghazali for example said the same thing in his Ihya Ullum al Deen, simply because Imam Suhrawardi’s methods for achieving Gnosis in his works resembled the works of previous thinkers it shouldn't be assumed and asserted (as western academics have incorrectly done) that is the place he learnt it from at every turn, to the neglect of the obvious influences in his life, Islam. He was a trained Shafii Faqih who practiced Tasawuuf before anything else, He followed a specific tariqah (school) in Tasawwuf with its own specific teachings and teachers. This accusation is equivalent to saying, that to be athletic one needs to train the body and therefor all Athletes learnt this fact from the first person who became an Athlete six thousand years ago, the product of training is self evident, it doesn't mean all Athletes know each other. 

In this regard the path to Gnosis (Maarifah), by renouncing the world, is the same no matter what time or place you live in and in fact Allah mentions this in very clear terms in the Quran, “But those will prosper who purify themselves. And glorify the name of their Lord in prayer. No, you prefer the life of this world; But the hereafter is better and more enduring (here Allah is encouraging people to renounce it). And this is in the books of the earliest revelations. The books of Abraham and Moses. (Surah al Alla 87:14-19) which predate the prophet Zoroaster and Plato.

The Zoroastrian Religion

“To thee (Muhammad) We sent the scripture (Qur'an) in truth confirming the scripture that came before it, and guarding it in safety. Say: Whoever is the enemy of Jibreel -- for surely he revealed it to your heart by Allah's command, verifying that which IS before it and guidance and good news for the believers.”(2:97)

Imam Suhrawardi looked into the quantum structure of the universe and drew ideas from different sources besides Islam, not unlike modern scholars who use science developed in many different countries to understand the scientific significance of verses in the Quran and the Ahadith of Rasul Allah (saws). 

To briefly go into the Zoroastrian religion, Allah in the Quran recognizes the Zoroastrians as people who believed in Allah mentioning them with the Jews and Christians: “Verily, those who believe and those who are Jews, and the Sabians, and the Christians, and the Majus, and those who worship others besides Allah, truly, Allah will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection. Verily! Allah is over all things a Witness”. (22:17). 

The 12th-century historian Imam al-Shahrastani describes the Majusiya as being three sects, the Kayumarthiya, the Zurwaniya and the Zaradushtiya, among which Imam al-Shahrastani said that only the last of the three were properly followers of Zoroaster, who muslims recognized as one of the prophets which Allah did not mention by name in the Quran. Regarding the recognition of a prophet, Zoroaster himself said: "They ask you as to how should they recognize a prophet and believe him to be true in what he says; tell them what he knows the others do not, and he shall tell you even what lies hidden in your nature; he shall be able to tell you whatever you ask him and he shall perform such things which others cannot perform." (Namah Shat Vakhshur Zartust, .5–7. 50–54) 

When the companions of the Prophet (saws), on invading Persia, came in contact with the Zoroastrian people and learned these teachings, they came to the conclusion that Zoroaster was a Divinely inspired prophet. Thus they accorded the same treatment to the Zoroastrian people which they did to other "People of the Book". 

He was regarded as one of those prophets whose names have not been mentioned in the Qur'an: "And We did send apostles before thee: there are some of them that We have mentioned to thee and there are others whom We have not mentioned to Thee." (40:78). Accordingly the companions treated the founder of Zoroastrianism as a true prophet as they did in other inspired creeds, and thus, protected the Zoroastrian religion and its people. 

Zoroaster was generally said to have lived about the 600 BCE, Ibrahim (as) was said to have lived about 1600 BCE and Musa (as) was said to have lived about 1200 BCE. Plato lived about 400 BCE so he was almost the prophets contemporary and a relatively accurate source for his teachings.

Zoroaster's name in his native language was Avestan. His English name, "Zoroaster", derives from a later (5th century BCE) Greek transcription, Zōroastrēs (Ζωροάστρης), as used in Xanthus's Lydiaca (Fragment 32) and in Plato's First Alcibiades (122a1).