Qadiri Naqshbandi, Qutb Allah, Rami Al Boustani Al Rifai | ‏بِسْمِ ٱللَّهِ ٱلرَّحْمَنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ ‏يُؤْتِى ٱلْحِكْمَةَ مَن يَشَآءُ ۚ وَمَن يُؤْتَ ٱلْحِكْمَةَ فَقَدْ أُوتِىَ خَيْرًۭا كَثِيرًۭا ۗ وَمَا يَذَّكَّرُ إِلَّآ أُو۟لُوا۟ ٱلْأَلْبَبِ|Bi.isim.Allah@outlook.com

About Rami

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Rami has created 436 blog entries.

Mans Place In The Universe and How Islam Encouraged People To Think About Creation

a6b5d5e042593e502ea5c3f67680d26dIslam methodically encouraged people to think about creation and its creator, Allah mentions all the laws of creation, which He has encouraged us to think about in the Qur’an;

“And He imparted unto Adam the names of all things; then He brought them within the ken of the angels and said: “Declare unto Me the names of these [things], if what you say is true.”

They replied: “Limitless art Thou in Thy glory! No knowledge have we save that which Thou hast imparted unto us. Verily, Thou alone art all-knowing, truly wise.”

Said He: “O Adam, convey unto them the names of these [things].” And as soon as [Adam] had conveyed unto them their names, [Allah] said: “Did I not say unto you, `Verily, I alone know the hidden reality of the heavens and the earth, and know all that you bring into the open and all that you would conceal’?”(2:31-33)

“And He taught Adam the names, that is, the names of things named, all of them, by placing knowledge of them into his heart; then He presented them…the majority of which concerned intellectual beings, to the angels and said, to them in reproach, ‘Now tell Me, inform Me, the names of these, things named, if you speak truly’, in your claim that I would not create anything more knowledgeable than you (Angels), or that you are more deserving of this vicegerency (responsibility); the response to the conditional sentence is intimated by what precedes it.” (Tafsir al Jalalayn)

Allah says to his Angels who live in the Unseen part of our world and see what is veiled to us, “Did I not say unto you, `Verily, I alone know the hidden reality”, Ghayb al Samawati wal Ard, “of the Heavens and the Earth”, in other words how the heavens and the earth work and the laws they run by, Allah was referring to a type of Ghayb (Unseen reality) the Angels did not see which was the Laws of the Heavens and the Earth.

At that time, in response the Angels referred to their understanding of Mans nature when Allah mentioned He would make Man His Khalifah (vicegerent) on earth, but in reply to them Allah referred to the Nature of the Universe when He Answered them regarding Man, saying to them there is a connection between mans physiology, his body, that you are objecting about and the nature of the Universe, which you haven’t learnt yet, what this connection is lies in what Allah had granted Adam at that time, the names of all things, and had just shown the Angels.

“AND LO! Thy Sustainer said unto the angels: “Behold, I am about to establish upon earth (a Khalifah) one who shall inherit it.” They said: “Wilt Thou place on it such as will spread corruption thereon and shed blood -whereas it is we who extol Thy limitless glory, and praise Thee, and hallow Thy name?” [Allah] answered: “Verily, I know that which you do not know.”(2:30) Said He: “O Adam, convey unto them the names of these [things].” And as soon as [Adam] had conveyed unto them their names, [Allah] said: “Did I not say unto you, `Verily, I alone know the hidden reality of the heavens and the earth, and know all that you bring into the open and all that you would conceal’?”(2:31-33)

The Angels understood they where a perfect creation, this was their reality as flawless beings, because they where perfect they thought they were complete, they could not perceive how a creation more exalted than them could be created, so they came to believe they where the Highest of Allah’s creations and took this as a given, having seen none of his other creatures surpass them. In response to this Allah said to them I have created Man and in regards to him, you do not know the Hidden realities of the Heavens and the Earth, implying Mans connection to the hidden Laws of the universe, which through them He would surpass the Angels in worth, but not strength and ability.

This same shortsightedness Iblis (Satan) suffered from in regards to man, when He objected to Adam surpassing him, Allah asked him why He objected, He replied he was stronger than him, fire being able to burn clay, but the example Allah had just set was regarding knowledge not strength, Adam would become more knowledgeable than him while Satan was limited in what he was capable of understanding, He was a lessor creation, so He replied in terms of strength while the point Allah was making to the Angels and Jinn was regarding knowledge. Adam had a higher rank than the Angels because of knowledge, the one with more knowledge is better capable of knowing Allah, and that is the reason why Allah created the Universe, to know him.

This entire affair is regarding man’s body in relation to the Angels and Jinn’s bodies, Allah makes this clear in the Quran, “It is We Who created you and gave you shape; then We bade the angels bow down to Adam, and they bowed down; not so Iblis (Satan); He refused to be of those who bow down. (Allah) said: “What prevented thee from bowing down when I commanded thee?” He said: “I am better than he: Thou didst create me from fire, and him from clay.” (Allah) said: “Get thee down from this: it is not for thee to be arrogant here: get out, for thou art of the meanest (of creatures).” (7: 11–13)

In another verse Allah mentions the command (laws) in His creation, “VERILY, your Sustainer is Allah, who has created the heavens and the earth in six aeons, and is established on the throne of His almightiness. He covers the day with the night in swift pursuit, with the sun and the moon and the stars subservient to His command (Laws): oh, verily, His is all creation and all command (they are mentioned separately). Hallowed is Allah, the Sustainer of all the worlds! (In the Universe)” (7:54)

When Allah mentioned “all creation” along with “all command” the rules of tafsir say the matters relate to each other, so in fact Allah is referring to the Laws of creation which are his command in creation.

 

The Prophet’s Mission and The Significance Of Knowledge

02482162ef0ad6121d2a11d5920048f9

[O MEN!] We have now bestowed upon you from on high a divine writ containing all that you ought to bear in mind will you not, then, use your reason?”[Qur’an 21;10]

“And Our Commandment is but one, as the twinkling of an eye.” [Qur’an 54:50]

“In time We shall make them fully understand Our messages [through what they perceive] in the utmost horizons [of the universe] and within themselves, so that it will become clear unto them that this [revelation] is indeed the truth. [Still,] is it not enough [for them to know] that thy Sustainer is witness unto everything?”[Qur’an 41:53]

“They know but the outer surface of this world’s life, whereas of the ultimate things they are utterly unaware.”[Qur’an 30:7]

The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said: “Every other Prophet was sent only to his people, whereas I have been sent to all mankind.” (Sahih al-Bukhari)

The Messenger of Allah (saws) said “I did not see any evil but I warned you about it, and I did not see any good but I guided you to it” it was the prophets (saws) role to see and discover the evil present in creation and in the actions of man, and Jinn, then to warn his Ummah (people) about them, and it was his role to see and discover the good present in creation and the actions of man, and Jinn, then to guide His Ummah to it, it was also his role to be conscious of Allah so He could see His signs in the Heavens and the Earth for us, He (saws) earned His (saws) rank with Allah before our creation so His (saws) life was for Allah and Allah sent him for our sake. In this way because the prophet gave up His (saws) self for Allah, He was the one who solely looked after the needs of the Ummah because His character was capable of fulfilling this role fully, Allah almost making it impermissible for us to have tawakul (reliance) on anything other than His prophet (saws).

We see the extent of this responsibility in the special rules that only the prophets were commanded to follow, because of this Allah honoured them by calling them His Rahma (mercy) for mankind, a state of existence that only a prophet is capable of living.

“It is not conceivable that a human being unto whom Allah had granted revelation, and sound judgment, and prophethood, should thereafter have said unto people, “Worship me beside Allah”; but rather [did he exhort them], “Become men of God by spreading the knowledge of the divine revelation, and by your own deep study [thereof].”(3:79)

Creation is a metaphor for Allah’s attributes, and an expression of His Will, “and in all that Allah has created in the heavens and the earth, are signs for those who are conscious (of him). ” (Al Qur’an 10:6-7), This metaphor for his attributes includes the Angels, Jinns and Humans, along with the rest of His creatures, man is capable of seeing Allah though that metaphor by understanding creation and what is in it, “And to Allah are the Highest similitudes”(16:60).

The prophet (saws) said human perfection lies in man’s ability to worship Allah as if we are seeing him, and if we can’t see him (see His qualities) then know that he sees you.

He is the creator of the Universe and through His creation everything we know occurs, but He created the Universe to represent His judgments so by understanding why things have occurred man can perceive Allah in creation, because both good and evil befall his creatures through what they have earned from their own actions man can put together this picture from his own experiences in life, “Wherever you may be, death will overtake you – even though you be in towers raised high. Yet, when a good thing happens to them, some [people] say, This is from Allah, whereas when evil befalls them, they say, This is from thee [O fellowman]! Say: All is from Allah. What, then, is amiss with these people that they are in no wise near to grasping the truth of what they are told?” (4:78).

Allah gives man good in life but evil comes into our life through our own actions, “Whatever good happens to thee is from Allah; and whatever evil befalls thee is from thyself (not your fellow man). AND WE have sent thee [O Muhammad] as an apostle unto all mankind: and none can bear witness [to it, the responsibility and task] as Allah does.” (4:79)

When Allah gave the prophet (saws) his mission He revealed to Mankind through Him knowledge about all areas of life and creation to help the Prophet (saws) in his work. Allah then said about what He granted His Messenger (saws), “We have explained in detail in this Qur’an, for the benefit of mankind, every kind of similitude”(18:54), this is so the Ummah of Muhammad (saws) can contemplate and draw knowledge by way of analogy to life from the similitude’s in the Quran about creation Allah had revealed, these examples are intended to help us in Life until the day of judgment.

The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said: “I was informed by the heavenly hosts of angels that the most dignified among my followers are people who rejoice in public when they ponder the vastness of Allah’s all-encompassing mercy and compassion, and they weep privately when they contemplate rigorous punishment He reserved for the sinners and the deniers of the truth. They sit in His blessed mosques morning and evening  worshipping Him and celebrating His praises inwardly, and they implore Him with their tongues outwardly with reverence and awe. They pray to Him with their hands raised as well as lowered, and they yearn for Him unceasingly. They take little from people, and yet, it bears heavily on their hearts.

They walk barefooted, humble, unpretentious, and unnoticed, just like ants, without finery; and they are free of self-adulation. They walk with dignity and serenity, and they rise to the nearness of their Lord through their link to His messenger (saws). They wear the garment of good conduct and follow the clear proof. They read the Qur’an regularly, take their daily guidance from it, and they happily make the necessary personal sacrifices to meet its requirements.  Almighty Allah has surrounded them with distinguished witnessing angels, and faithful guardians, and He has illumined their faces with effulgence as a sign of His blessings upon them and as a demonstration of His satisfaction with them. When they look at His servants, they anticipate promising signs. They often contemplate the vastness of Allah’s creation.

Their bodies dwell on earth, and their eyes are anchored upon the heavens. Their feet stand on earth, and their hearts dwell in the heavens. They breath on earth, and yet, their spirits are connected to the divine Throne. Their souls live in this world, and their thoughts are focused on the hereafter. They only worry about what may come. Their graves are in this world, and their ranks are exalted in Allah’s sight.” God’s messenger (saws) then recited: “Such is the reward of one who reveres My Majesty, and fears My warning.” (Qur’an, 14:14) (Hilyat-ul Awliya Wa Tabaqat al-Asfiya By Imam Abu Na’im al-Asfahani)

If the Qur’an is read, studied, understood and perceived we would find in it, beside guidance, knowledge about the laws of science such as physics, mathematics, chemistry, biology and geology, there are almost 750 verses in the Qur’an encouraging and guiding people to contemplate Allah’s creation, pointing to specific aspects of science so we can study the universe.

“Say: “Roam the earth and observe how the creation was initiated.” (29:20)

“behold, there are messages indeed for people who think!” (30:21)

“behold, there are messages indeed for all who are possessed of [innate] knowledge!” (30:22)

“behold, there are messages indeed for people who [are willing to] listen!” (30:23)

“behold, there are messages indeed for people who use their reason!” (30:24)

The word signs and messages, usually translated from the Arabic word Ayat, means there is information to be learnt by looking at these things, the context of the verse tells us how this information is gained and what is meant by the word Ayat in this specific case, because at times it refers to science at other times it means to gain wisdom from something, and at other times it means spiritual signs we perceive inwardly.

If the verse is referring to the creation of man then Allah is asking man to study the world and discover that knowledge through scientific means, but as Allah sent revelation to the prophets and they learnt about all his different Ayat (signs) through Maarifa (gnosis) Allah often asks man to gain that knowledge through these means, which is the meaning behind the story of al Khidr (as) and Musa (as) in the Quran mentioned in surah al kahf (18), Musa (as) received revelations from Allah while al Khidr (as) received knowledge through Maarifa (gnosis), yet He (ra) was considered more knowledgable than the prophet (as) because it takes an immense amount of knowledge to see and understand the universe through this manner, this is because al Khidr was capable of putting together the metaphors and smilies Allah had placed in the Universe for us from his knowledge of life and understand them, these are Allah’s Ayat (signs) in life, while Musa (Moses) Allah was still teaching, and so He sent him to al Khidr (ra) to learn this from him.

In regards to science the Prophet (saws) said, “The scholars are the inheritors of the Prophets” (Ahmad, Abu Dawwud, Tirmidhi and others).

The nature of many verses in the Quran encourage us to understand their depths, in relation to our own understanding of life and Allah’s creation, this is the conversation Allah is having with each person to help them develop and complete the picture of life He is teaching them, the Messenger of Allah, upon him be peace, said, ‘one who travels a path seeking sacred knowledge, Allah will make easy for him the path to the Garden’, meaning to perform the actions of it’s people, this is it’s path in life.

And he, upon him be peace, said, ‘the angels lower their wings for the seeker of sacred knowledge, pleased with what he is doing.’ And he, upon him be peace, said, ‘attending the gatherings of sacred knowledge is greater than the performance of a thousand prayer cycles, visiting a thousand sick people, and attending a thousand funerals’, this it’s magnitude, And he, upon him be peace, said, ‘Allah undertakes responsibility for the sustenance of the seeker of knowledge. This responsibility is a special responsibility beyond His general responsibility for all creatures on the earth as expressed in His words “There is not a creature on the earth but that Allah bears its sustenance”’(11:6).

‘Its meaning is ‘increase in ease and removal of hardships in the seeking and acquiring provision’. In a long Hadith, the Messenger, upon him be peace, said, ‘it, that is, sacred knowledge, is inspired in the felicitous and prevented from the wretched’.

“The scholars that embody their knowledge, are the medium between the Messenger of Allah (saws) and the Muslims. Allah said in reference to the excellence of the scholars: “Allah bears witness that there is no god but Him, as do the angels and the people of knowledge, upholding justice”. (3:18) Allah associated them with His angels in bearing witness to His Oneness and maintaining His justice on earth.

Allah, Exalted be He, said: “are they the same – those who know and those who do not know?”(39:9)

“They are not equal either in this world nor the Hereafter, rather Allah has preferred the people of knowledge over those who do not know by many degrees, as He, Exalted be He, has said: “Allah will raise in rank those of you who believe and those that have been given knowledge”.(58:11) What is meant here is that those who have knowledge will be raised above those who believe (but do not have knowledge). The Messenger of Allah, upon him be peace, said, ‘the preference of the scholar over the worshipper (abid) is like my preference over the lowest of my companions’. In another version, it has been said ‘like the moon on the night when it is full over the rest of the planets” (which look like normal stars).

“The scholar who does not act upon his knowledge is stripped of this status. He should not be misled by what has been mentioned by Allah and his Messenger, upon him be peace, regarding the excellence of knowledge and delude himself into thinking that he is included in that solely by knowledge without action. The Messenger of Allah, upon him be peace, said, ‘learn what you will, for, by Allah, it will not be accepted from you until you act upon it.’ And he, upon him be peace, said, ‘one who increases in knowledge and does not increase in guidance increases in nothing but distance from Allah.’ Knowledge only gains that high rank with Allah when it benefits the servants of Allah. When a scholar does not derive benefit from his knowledge, how can others derive benefit from it? So recognise the loss of excellence that will befall one who has knowledge but does not act upon it.

The Messenger, upon him be peace, said, ‘the person most severely punished on the Day of Judgement will be the scholar whom Allah did not benefit by his knowledge.’ For that reason, the Messenger of Allah, upon him be peace, used to seek refuge from knowledge that does not benefit and from a heart that does not feel humility. The scholar that does not act upon his knowledge has nothing but the empty shell and mere image of knowledge, devoid of its true meaning and reality. Some of the righteous predecessors may Allah’s mercy be upon them, said, ‘knowledge invites to action. Either he answers or it leaves, meaning ‘its spirit, light and blessing goes and only the outer form remains (empty words). This does not go, but rather stays as evidence against the blameworthy scholar.’”

If the scholar teaches his knowledge to people and they derive benefit from him, then he is like a burning candle that illuminates for the people. Allah, Exalted be He, has said: “Do you order people to devoutness and forget yourselves when you recite the Book, will you not use your intellects?” (2:44)

Ibn ‘Abbas (ra) reported, that the Messenger of Allah (saws) advised a group of his companions: “When you pass by the meadows of Paradise indulge freely in it!” They said: “O Messenger of Allah! What are the meadows of Paradise?” He said: “The circles of ‘Ilm (knowledge)” (At-Tabarani). This similitude the prophet (saws) employed is real, and not an empty metaphor, because He (saws) said the Angels lower their wings for any person seeking knowledge, the effect of this can be perceived from the atmosphere in gatherings where knowledge is sought and learned, they are unlike any other place, so the prophet (saws) was revealing to us the reality that exists in the unseen part of our world that brings about this atmosphere we perceive when learning.

The Islamic Quantum Structure Of The Universe

64ef4047c0037ae33d4b4d43475a66edIntroduction

This section isn’t part of the original intended work or essential to it, it is rather an extension of the knowledge already mentioned, it is included to resolve the question, to what extent did muslim scholars discuss the quantum nature of the universe, and to further remove the misinformation surrounding the origins of Islamic Intellectual thought. In answering the question one scholars work is presented but it shouldn’t be thought of as the total extent of the matter.

In the works of scholars throughout Islamic history, such as Imam al Ghazali and Imam Ibn al Arabi, they have touched upon the Quantum structure of the Universe. All muslim scholars read the same Quran, studied the same Sunnah, Hadith literature along with the Seerah (biography of the prophet) to draw knowledge from. The Ash’ari and Maturidi Aqeedah speaks about the nature of the quantum world but some scholars took this further and conceptualized the entire quantum structure of the universe from what the Quran and Sunnah have said.

Imam Suhrawardi

One scholar in particular who’s work was rejected because of its inaccuracies was Imam Shihab al-Din al-Suhrawardi (d.1193, Imam al Ghazali d.1111), he was a Shafi‘i Sunni scholar and possibly followed the Ashari Aqeedah as he speaks about the Aradh (accidents) and Jawhar (substances) in his works. We are presenting parts of his work here to clarify what has been said about him and to expand peoples understanding of classical islamic thought on the quantum world. The Islamic sources for his work are provided as this has been something western academics have intellectually blundered. I should add again his work was not considered Orthodox because it was assumed to be unique, speaking about the quantum world, something scholars rarely do, but it is clearly derived from the Quran and Ahadith, as he himself was an Orthodox Scholar (Sunni). 

In 1183, Imam Suhrawardi arrived in Aleppo (Syria), the year Salah al Deen (d.1193) conquered the city and handed it’s governance over to his son al-Zahir (d.1216), who the Imam befriended. In 1186, he completed his most significant work, “Kitab Hikmat al-Ishraq”. Hikmat al Ishraq literally means the “Wisdom of Illumination”, referring to the light Allah created the Universe, Angels, Pen and Intellect from, mentioned in the Quran and Sunnah. The title of the work gives the literal intention behind the Imam’s work because in Islam wisdom is from Allah, “And whosoever is granted wisdom is indeed granted abundant good”(2:269). 

Because all Muslims scholars drew on the same sources we can understand how there ideas would seem similar to the layman, but be vastly different to the expert. In light of this the Imams work teaches similar ideas to what Imam al Ghazali said about the structure of the universe and what Imam al Suyuti (d.1505) said Angels are, in relation to their role in this universe, neither scholars having anything to do with Imam Suhrawardi’s work which only found limited acceptance. The only similarity is that each scholar followed the Shafii Madhhab of Fiqh (Legal School of Thought), meaning they would have employed the same rules (Usul) for interpretation and applied the same Usul al Fiqh (Principles of Jurisprudence) to the Quran and Sunnah, they all practiced Tasawwuf, and possibly they all followed the same Ashari Aqeedah.

Imam Suhrawardi’s ideas where rejected because of the inaccuracies of his other sources, but through them he developed his own unique theories regarding the quantum world. Besides the Quran and Sunnah, he drew upon the works Zoroaster, a Prophet Allah had sent to persia more than a thousand of years earlier, and Plato, who like Imam Suhrawardi relied upon the same prophets revelations. In using Plato’s works, because of the sources Plato relied upon, it can be understood, as he said himself, he was seeking the knowledge Allah gave to the prophet Zoroaster. He was also a critique of Ibn Sina’s theories and teachings (like Imam al Ghazali) among other Ancient philosophers. 

The Imam, although used the works of Philosophers rejected Philosophy, something he made clear in much of his writings for essentially the same reasons as Imam al Ghazali in his Incoherence of the Philosophers. 

The Imam was attempting to understand the scientific nature of Allah’s light in the universe throughout his works. Imam Suhrawardi, who was of persian origin like the prophet, and in his Hikmat al-Ishraq states why he considered the teachings of Zoroaster important:

“There was among the ancient Persians a community of people guided by God (Zoroastrians) who thus walked the true way, worthy Sages, with no resemblance to the Magi (Dualists, philosophers). It is their precious philosophy of Light, the same as that to which the mystical experience of Plato and his predecessors bear witness, that we have revived in our book called Hikmat al-‘Ishraq, and I have had no precursor in the way of such project”. 

he said elsewhere this constitutes a superior means of accessing the luminous reality and the divine realm of Haq, (understanding the true state of something, whether good for you or harmful or something else).

He considered Plato and his Greek predecessors Gnostics, and not simply philosophers as the modern ascription, because in reality you cant be a philosopher and a gnostic at the same time, and relied upon his writings which where based on the teachings of the Prophet Zoroaster. He classified the learned men according to their respective merits in discursive (philosophy) and intuitive (Gnostic) knowledge. As Imam Ibn al Arabi explained in his works, the Imam similarly said, Prophetic knowledge relies on the functions of the faculty of (the minds inner eye) imagination, its role in the particularization of universal truths (the hearts ability to encompass the larger reality of something). Prophecy becomes the ‘direct’ experience of the world of lights (Nur Allah). The Imam speaks about the ability of mans inner eye to see Barzakh and scientifically explains this ability of the Prophets and the Awliya, to access the unseen realms where quantum beings (Angels and Jinn) and forms (Jannah and Jahanam) already exist. Such people are either commissioned or uncommissioned by Allah to receive and transmit his message, the prophets being those who are the most perfect in passing on Allah’s revelation.

Imam Ali said “The vision of the eye is limited; the vision of the heart transcends all barriers of time and space” to be succinct, this saying of Imam Ali sums up everything Imam Suhrawardi was trying to explain in scientific terms throughout all his works, regarding the vision of the heart and its light, in doing so he relied on the works of people who had gained this vision, the people of Gnosis. 

The Messenger of Allah (saws) said: “Amongst the nation of Bani Israel who lived before you, there were men who used to be inspired with guidance though they were not Prophets, and if there is any such person amongst my followers, it is Umar.”(Bukhari)

And he said: “Among the nations before you there were Muhaddathun (people who were inspired, though they were not Prophets). And if there is any such a person among my followers, it would be ‘Umar” (Agreed upon)

Umar (r.a) was given the gift of true inspiration which is the characteristic of Allah’s Friends named kashf or “unveiling.” The prophet (saws) said “Allah has engraved truth on the tongue of `Umar and his heart” and “If there were a Prophet after me verily it would be `Umar.” 

Imam al-Tirmidhi said that according to Ibn `Uyayna “spoken to” (muhaddathun) means “made to understand” (mufahhamun), while in his narration Muslim added: “Ibn Wahb explained ‘spoken to’ as ‘inspired’ (mulham).” This is the majority’s opinion according to Ibn Hajar who said: “‘Spoken to’ means ‘by the angels’.” 

Imam al-Nawawi and Ibn Hajar said respectively in Sharh Sahih Muslim and Fath al-Bari: The scholars have differed concerning “spoken to.” Ibn Wahb said it meant “inspired” (mulham). It was said also: “Those who are right, and when they give an opinion it is as if they were spoken to, and then they give their opinion. It was said also: “The angels speak to them…” Bukhari said: “Truth comes from their tongues.” This hadith contains a confirmation of the miracles of the saints (karamat al-awliya). The one among

[Muslims] who is “spoken to,” if his existence is ascertained (he is Siddiq), what befalls him is not used as basis for a legal judgment, rather he is obliged to evaluate it with the Qur’an, and if it conforms to it or to the Sunna, he acts upon it, otherwise he leaves it.

The Imam in his work criticizes philosophers like Aristotle and says regarding his own work Hikmat al Anwar (The Wisdom of Lights) ‘only direct experience guarantees acquisition of true knowledge’, not philosophy.

This all originates from the fact He practiced Tassawwuf and this has been the way of Islam from its first days, in fact those specific words can be traced back to the earliest Islamic scholars. Imam al Ghazali for example said the same thing in his Ihya Ullum al Deen, simply because Imam Suhrawardi’s methods for achieving Gnosis in his works resembled the works of previous thinkers it shouldn’t be assumed and asserted (as western academics have incorrectly done) that is the place he learnt it from at every turn, to the neglect of the obvious influences in his life, Islam. He was a trained Shafii Faqih who practiced Tasawuuf before anything else, He followed a specific tariqah (school) in Tasawwuf with its own specific teachings and teachers. This accusation is equivalent to saying, that to be athletic one needs to train the body and therefor all Athletes learnt this fact from the first person who became an Athlete six thousand years ago, the product of training is self evident, it doesn’t mean all Athletes know each other. 

In this regard the path to Gnosis (Maarifah), by renouncing the world, is the same no matter what time or place you live in and in fact Allah mentions this in very clear terms in the Quran, “But those will prosper who purify themselves. And glorify the name of their Lord in prayer. No, you prefer the life of this world; But the hereafter is better and more enduring (here Allah is encouraging people to renounce it). And this is in the books of the earliest revelations. The books of Abraham and Moses. (Surah al Alla 87:14-19) which predate the prophet Zoroaster and Plato.

The Zoroastrian Religion

“To thee (Muhammad) We sent the scripture (Qur’an) in truth confirming the scripture that came before it, and guarding it in safety. Say: Whoever is the enemy of Jibreel — for surely he revealed it to your heart by Allah’s command, verifying that which IS before it and guidance and good news for the believers.”(2:97)

Imam Suhrawardi looked into the quantum structure of the universe and drew ideas from different sources besides Islam, not unlike modern scholars who use science developed in many different countries to understand the scientific significance of verses in the Quran and the Ahadith of Rasul Allah (saws). 

To briefly go into the Zoroastrian religion, Allah in the Quran recognizes the Zoroastrians as people who believed in Allah mentioning them with the Jews and Christians: “Verily, those who believe and those who are Jews, and the Sabians, and the Christians, and the Majus, and those who worship others besides Allah, truly, Allah will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection. Verily! Allah is over all things a Witness”. (22:17). 

The 12th-century historian Imam al-Shahrastani describes the Majusiya as being three sects, the Kayumarthiya, the Zurwaniya and the Zaradushtiya, among which Imam al-Shahrastani said that only the last of the three were properly followers of Zoroaster, who muslims recognized as one of the prophets which Allah did not mention by name in the Quran. Regarding the recognition of a prophet, Zoroaster himself said: “They ask you as to how should they recognize a prophet and believe him to be true in what he says; tell them what he knows the others do not, and he shall tell you even what lies hidden in your nature; he shall be able to tell you whatever you ask him and he shall perform such things which others cannot perform.” (Namah Shat Vakhshur Zartust, .5–7. 50–54) 

When the companions of the Prophet (saws), on invading Persia, came in contact with the Zoroastrian people and learned these teachings, they came to the conclusion that Zoroaster was a Divinely inspired prophet. Thus they accorded the same treatment to the Zoroastrian people which they did to other “People of the Book”. 

He was regarded as one of those prophets whose names have not been mentioned in the Qur’an: “And We did send apostles before thee: there are some of them that We have mentioned to thee and there are others whom We have not mentioned to Thee.” (40:78). Accordingly the companions treated the founder of Zoroastrianism as a true prophet as they did in other inspired creeds, and thus, protected the Zoroastrian religion and its people. 

Zoroaster was generally said to have lived about the 600 BCE, Ibrahim (as) was said to have lived about 1600 BCE and Musa (as) was said to have lived about 1200 BCE. Plato lived about 400 BCE so he was almost the prophets contemporary and a relatively accurate source for his teachings.

Zoroaster’s name in his native language was Avestan. His English name, “Zoroaster”, derives from a later (5th century BCE) Greek transcription, Zōroastrēs (Ζωροάστρης), as used in Xanthus’s Lydiaca (Fragment 32) and in Plato’s First Alcibiades (122a1). 

1cef70bd74b1311e6f128b6dd2577a67The Quantum Structure of the Universe

If we keep in mind the verse of Light (24:35) and it’s meaning then we can see how close the scholars of Islam came to explaining the universe in relation to modern physics.

This verse is a representation of the quantum world and the manner by which subatomic particles exist. “We have explained in detail in this Qur’an, for the benefit of mankind, every kind of similitude: but man is, in most things, contentious” (18:54) 

Allah says the example of his light is like a niche (this is the particle existing in the field), a crevasse or something like a hole in the middle of a wall (the wall being the similitude of the field). In this hole is a lamp (this is the particle), the lamp is in glass (this is the particle creating its own outer shell or field), the glass is like a pearly white star (this is caused by its excitation), lit from the blessed oil (these are the forces in the universe, particles are created because of them) of a blessed olive tree (the hierarchy of particles in the universe, particles are created from smaller particles and the oil comes from the tree), the source of this light is neither of the east or of the west, it is fueling itself, whose oil would almost glow even if unattached by fire. It has a depth, and it is light upon light (particles are created by smaller particles which in turn are created from smaller particles), through this reality Allah guides whom He wills (though this structure, as consciousness is a state of matter like a solid or liquid, but quantum, it is born from the same laws that govern the Universe and guided through it). And Allah presents examples for the people and Allah is Knowing of all things

The prophet (saws) said “Allah hath Seventy Thousand Veils of Light and Darkness: were He to withdraw their curtain, then would the splendors of His Aspect surely consume everyone who apprehended Him with his sight.” (Imam al Ghazali Mishqat al Anwar).

Imam Suhrawardi taught that all the universe is a successive outflow from the original Light of Allah, Light of Lights (Nur al-Anwar). The fundamentals of his teaching is pure light, that unfolds from the Light of Allah in a descending order of ever-diminishing intensity in relation to Allah’s splendor, and through complex interaction, gives rise to a “horizontal” array of other lights. In other words, the universe and all levels of existence are but varying degrees of Light—the light and the darkness.

In the Niche of Lights (Mishqat al Anwar), Imam al-Ghazali (d.1111) discussed this using Qur’anic terminology of light, whereas Imam Suhrawardi, in his Wisdom of Illumination, according to western academics who could not trace his sources, “developed a truly original light ontology”, in other words he proposed a unique structure to the quantum nature of the universe. 

Allah says about the first moments of creation, “And the heaven We created with might, and indeed We are (its) expander.” (Quran 51:47), “Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, then We separated them, and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?” (Quran 21:30)

“In the previous verse (21:30), the Arabic words ratq and fataq are used.  The word ratq can be translated into “entity” “sewn to” “joined together” or “closed up”.  The meaning of these translations all circulate around something that is mixed and that has a separate and distinct existence.  The verb fataq is translated into “We unstitched” “We clove them asunder” “We separated” or “We have opened them”.  These meanings imply that something comes into being by an action of splitting or tearing apart.  The sprouting of a seed from the soil is a good example of a similar illustration of the meaning of the verb fataq”. 

Today physicist have coined the term the big bang, the universe came into being from a singularity, matter and time both unfolding as the universe we know today, implied in this is the idea that we can trace the origins of matter and particles by there earlier states in the universe, as they developed to the forms we know today. For example Iron did not exist at the first moment of creation rather Iron is created by extremely large, extremely hot (over 2.5 billion kelvin) stars through the silicon burning process, meaning the stars that created Iron had to form first.

The Imam explained that while light always remains in itself identical, its proximity (depth as we go deeper into the quantum aspects of the universe) or distance from the Light of Allah (its origin) determines the ontic (real) light reality of all beings (referring to the origin of matter from the light of Allah). Light operates through the activities of dominion (the way successive lights, like the generations of particles, interact with each other) of the higher ‘triumphal’ or ‘victorial’ lights, as well as the desire of the lower lights (lower generation of particles) for the higher ones (referring to a hierarchy of varying types of lights and their nature), operating at all levels and hierarchies of the universe. 

Reality proceeds from the Light of Lights (Allah’s light) and unfolds via the First Light (the lowest generation of particles) and all the subsequent (generations of) lights whose exponential interactions bring about the existence of all entities. As each new (generation of) light interacts with other existing lights, more light and dark substances are generated. Light produces both immaterial and substantial lights, such as immaterial intellects (Angels), human and animal souls. 

Light also produces dusky substances, such as bodies. Light can generate both luminous accidents (Aradh), such as those in immaterial lights, physical lights or rays, and dark accidents, whether it be in immaterial lights or in bodies (similar to the Ashrari conceptualization of the universe, through the Aradh, accident, and Jawhar, substance).

With the notion of intensity of light, Imam Suhrawardi then develops his two-fold process of light production. A vertical hierarchy (generations) and a horizontal hierarchy of pure immaterial light structure (termed) his “Illuminationist” quantum physics. From the Light of Lights proceeds a first vertical hierarchy (generation) of lights from which is created a Second Light (generation), and from which the all-encompassing barzakh, unseen quantum world is created, (this order here is referring to the big bang and how the universe was created from the first light), from the Second level of lights a Third Light level (generation) of lights is created, and the Second (level of) barzakh (the unseen quantum world has levels of existence and depth), or the Sphere of Fixed Stars, and so forth. The vertical hierarchy (generation) of lights interacts with a horizontal hierarchy (generation) of lights (not unlike the hierarchy of elementary particles). 

Out of the interaction of the vertical and the horizontal lights, the bodies of the lower physical world are generated. These horizontal or vertical lights are all structurally interrelated.

The two dimensional hierarchy of lights introduces a new non linear notion of quantum causation. The multiplication of quantum entities serves to increase the ontological distance that exists between the Light of Lights (in the quantum world) and the sublunar world (that resulted from it), while simultaneously providing a greater holistic view of reality, since light lies at its core.

The Imam in his tafsir of what the Quran (such as 24:35) and Sunnah mention of Light, makes mistakes in relation to what Light is in this process, while Allah says “the similarity of Allah’s light is…”, it wasn’t clear to what extent he though of light as literal in the creation of the universe because he eventually says from this light matter and the world is created. But essentially he is accurate in the quantum structure of the universe. 

The Imam states that from energy matter can be created and quantum particles create other quantum particles which in turn creates everything in the universe in a hierarchy, and in descriptive terms such as the verse of light the similitude of energy and quantum particles is that of light. 

The Imam’s work regarding matter being created from light is much more accurate than previously presumed. Scientists have long been able to convert matter to energy, an example is a nuclear explosion, where a small amount of matter creates tremendous energy. Physicists have recently succeeded in doing the opposite, converting energy in the form of light into matter. Researchers have worked out how to make matter from pure light, the theory underpinning the idea was first described 80 years ago. 

At the time due to the state of technology the conversion of light into matter was considered impossible in a laboratory. Two particles of light, or photons, could combine to produce an electron and its antimatter equivalent, a positron. Electrons are particles of matter that form the outer shells of atoms in everyday objects around us. Scientist considered this the most elegant demonstrations of the famous relationship showing matter and energy are interchangeable currencies, E=mc^2.

“Photons are massless particles which don’t interact with each other, because they have no mass, if we shine two laser beams at each other, they simply pass through one another, but “Photonic molecules,” behave less like traditional lasers and more like something you might find in science fiction – the light saber”.

“Scientists created a special type of medium in which photons interact with each other so strongly that they begin to act as though they have mass, and they bind together to form molecules. When these photons interact with each other, they’re pushing against and deflecting each other. The physics of what’s happening in these molecules is similar to what we see in the movies”. 

The verse of light is a metaphor for the subatomic structure of the universe, it begins by Allah relating the metaphor to all creation then ending it by relating it to Allah’s knowledge of all things created and uncreated, meaning this is the form He has chosen to reveal himself through. This wisdom in the nature of creation is mentioned by the Ulumah, essentially it is so all beings can know each other through our human nature and Him, despite our vast difference in bodies and location in the Universe. 

It would be fair to say that man could not have understood the universe if he didn’t understand the light spectrum he studied on earth, different colors in space would tell man the composition and nature of what was occurring, thus through similarities he already understood he began to unravel the mysteries of space and creation.

The Wisdom Behind a Quantum and Physical Universe

“AND LO! Thy Sustainer said unto the angels: “Behold, I am about to establish upon earth (a Khalifah)  one who shall inherit it.” They said: “Wilt Thou place on it such as will spread corruption thereon and shed blood – whereas it is we who extol Thy limitless glory, and praise Thee, and hallow Thy name?” [Allah] answered: “Verily, I know that which you do not know.”(2:30)

When Man was created and before he had been placed on earth and performed a single act good or bad, the Angels said about him “Wilt Thou place on it such as will spread corruption thereon and shed blood”, this wasn’t an accusation, Angels don’t have imagination they know and speak from pure knowledge, this was said because they witnessed mans creation and understood his nature and the nature of the place Allah was sending him to. 

It is a place of limited light, the lowest aspect of creation, the physical world, where the light Man’s heart needs to sense the world around it is only attainable through mans actions, it isn’t given freely like in Jannah (Heaven) which if we can imagine it’s existence is in the quantum universe behind a barzakh a place of light and energy, the Angels understood man through his nature because they are created from Light and asked Allah, Why. 

To which Allah responded “Did I not say unto you, `Verily, I alone know the hidden reality of the heavens and the earth, and know all that you bring into the open and all that you would conceal’?”(2:32-33). Allah said to them i know more about the Laws of the Universe and how Man will be on earth than you, and this was said in relation to mans ability to know all of the universe and everything in it. 

“And He imparted unto Adam the names of all things; then He brought them within the ken of the angels and said: “Declare unto Me the names of these [things], if what you say is true. They (the Angels) replied: “Limitless art Thou in Thy glory! No knowledge have we save that which Thou hast imparted unto us. Verily, Thou alone art all-knowing, truly wise.”(2:31-33)

The hearts of the Angels don’t see like ours, they don’t see with the imagination as we do, they are made from light, hence they don’t have an imagination, they only know what they are given knowledge of. The Angels who are created from the same quantum particles as the universe and one of the four fundamental forces governing it, can see what is occurring from a quantum level, the Jinn who are on a similar nature to Angels have a heart that is something in between a Humans and an Angels, they are created from thermal energy (heat), have less perception than an Angel but more than a humans and are on earth being tested like Man. Man was created with Allah’s two hands, his immediate perception is not the same as Angels and Jinn, but his Heart can encompass more than theirs, something man was given freely by Allah, hence he can surpass both in wisdom and perfection.

Allah then Said: “O Adam, convey unto them the names of these [things].” And as soon as [Adam] had conveyed unto them their names, [Allah] said: “Did I not say unto you, `Verily, I alone know the hidden reality of the heavens and the earth, and know all that you bring into the open and all that you would conceal’?” (What is in your Hearts) (2:31-33)

The heart of man, like Adam, has the capacity to know all creation (by its manner of existence), Allah gave Adam revelation of all the names but we have to gain knowledge of them by other means. 

The first step to knowing something is to know its name, so while Adam was given the names of all things, the Prophet Muhammad (saws) was given the keys to their knowledge, and we are discovering that knowledge. 

Abu Huraira related that Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with awe, and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and placed in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures. (Bukhari) 

That treasure is the knowledge of everything Adam was given, and this is reflected in the history of man and our recent advancement in knowledge compared to mans previous ages. its often stated while previous prophets where given clear miracles like Isa (as) who could raise the dead in front of people and heal the sick the miracle of the prophet Muhammad (saws) was the Quran itself, and this refers to the knowledge contained in it and it’s role in life evident by the Muslim Ummah it produced which lead the world in knowledge for the past 1400 years. 

One of the primary effects of it’s existence was the unparalleled sharing and development of knowledge from one side of the earth to the other, it lifted Europe from the dark ages it was in and by comparison China at that time chose to close it’s borders and keep it’s advanced knowledge to itself. 

Imam Ali in saying that “The vision of the eye is limited; (while) the vision of the heart transcends all barriers of time and space” understood all this about the nature of man existence on earth, as well as many scholars through out history like Imam al Ghazali. 

That connection in the heart of man relating to time and space is made because particles can be entangled regardless of space and distance, and as Imam al Ghazali and Imam Ibn al Arabi among many others explained, the Quran is the “Sun” for mans imagination (inner sight). 

It is its guide to the real things in the universe because it is Allah’s literal words, not mans words describing what He said and taught, this is the Quran’s significance in relation to this vision of the heart which other religious text’s don’t have, usualy they are historical accounts of the lives of these prophetic figures and by comparison that is the Seera (biography) of the prophet, not revelation itself (the literal words of Allah the creator). 

The Prophet (saws) said: “Trials are presented to the heart (repeatedly) as a mat is woven straw by straw. So, whichever heart absorbs it, a black spot is blotched on it, and whichever heart deflects it, a white dot is spotted on it. (This continues) until hearts become one of two states: a whitened heart that is not harmed by any trial so long as the heavens and the earth remain, or a blackened, deviant heart that knows no good and rejects no evil except what it absorbs of its desires” (Reported by Muslim). 

The Quran directs the heart and its vision to the things in the unseen world and what it sees is true, only his imagination distorts his perception. Hence the Angels have no imagination, or need of it, they only know from direct knowledge and experience. 

In one narration the prophet (saws) asked Jibril (as) about the extent of his knowledge to which He answered, i can see to the extent of the number of leafs on this tree.

All this is clearly explained in the famous Hadith of Harithah, the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, asked him, “Harithah, how are you this morning?” He said, “This morning I have become a true mu’min.” He said, “Think about what you are saying! Because every statement has a reality.” He said, “Messenger of Allah, my self dislikes the world, so that it is sleepless at night and thirsty in the day, and it is as if I am gazing upon the Throne of my Lord appearing, and it is as if I am gazing upon the people of the Garden in the Garden and how they visit each other in it, and it as if I am gazing upon the people of the Fire and how they howl in it.” He said, “You have seen, so remain firm. [You are] a slave whom Allah has illuminated the iman in his heart.” (Narrated by Tabarani, Suyuti, al-Haythami in Majma` al-zawa’id in the “Chapter on the Reality of Belief and its Perfection“, al-Askari, Ibn al-Mubarak, Abd al-Razzaq, Bayhaqi and Imam Abu Hanifa mentions it in his al-Fiqh al-Akbar, among others.)

This hadith was recorded by Imam Ibn Rajab al Hanbali in his famous Compendium of Knowledge and Wisdom, a Tafsir to Imam Nawawi’s famous 40 hadith under his Tafsir of the Hadith of Jibril (hadith no.2), where the Prophet of Allah (saws) says Human Perfection (Ihsan) is “That you worship Allah as if you see Him, for if you don’t see Him then truly He sees you.” (Bukhari and Muslim)

The most famous and most Important hadith in all Islam is the hadith of Jibril which occurred 86 days before the prophets (saws) death and was witnessed by many companions who reported it. The Prophet was sitting with a group of companions when Jibril came to Him in the form of a man wearing extremely white cloths showing no sign of travel through the desert and having exceedingly black Hair.

Umar, may Allah be pleased with him, said, “While we were sitting with the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless with him and grant him peace, one day a man came up to us whose clothes were extremely white, whose hair was extremely black, upon whom traces of traveling could not be seen, and whom none of us knew, until he sat down close to the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, so that he rested his knees upon his knees and placed his two hands upon his thighs and said,

‘Muhammad, tell me about Islam.’

The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, ‘Islam is that you witness that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and you establish the prayer, and you give the Zakat, and you fast Ramadan, and you perform the hajj of the House if you are able to take a way to it.’

He said, ‘You have told the truth,’

and we were amazed at him asking him and [then] telling him that he told the truth.

He said, ‘Tell me about Iman.’

He said, ‘That you affirm Allah, His Angels, His Books, His messengers, and the Last Day, and that you affirm the Decree, the good of it and the bad of it.’

He said, ‘You have told the truth.’

He said, ‘Tell me about Ihsan.’

He said, ‘That you worship Allah as if you see Him, for if you don’t see Him then truly He sees you.’

He said, ‘Tell me about the Hour.’

He said, ‘The one asked about it knows no more than the one asking.’

He said, ‘Then tell me about its tokens.’

He said, ‘That the female slave should give birth to her mistress, and you see poor, naked, barefoot shepherds of sheep and goats competing in making tall buildings.’

He went away, and I remained some time. Then he asked, ‘Umar, do you know who the questioner was?’ I said, ‘Allah and His Messenger know best.’ He said, ‘He was Jibril who came to you to teach you your deen’.” (Muslim and Bukhari narrated it and has a grade Higher than Sahih and that is “Agreed upon”).

This hadith is described by Imam Nawawi as one of the hadiths upon which the Islamic religion turns. The use of the word Deen in the last line, “Atakum yu’aallimukum dinakum”, He “came to you to teach you your religion” entails that the religion of Islam is composed of the four fundamentals mentioned in the hadith: Islam, or external compliance with what Allah asks of us (Fiqh); Iman, or the belief in the Unseen that the prophets have informed us of (Aqeedah); Ihsan, or to worship Allah as though one sees Him (Attaining Human Perfection); and The Hour, or the remembrance of death and the afterlife (Remembering the Akhira).

The reason it is one of the most important Hadiths in all of Islam is because it summed up all the parts of the Deen (Religion of Islam) 86 days before the prophets (saws) death, at a time when Allah revealed the verse, “This day have I perfected your religion for you (sent down all it should be about), completed My favor upon you (decided your blessings and what you shall receive spiritually and materially), and have chosen for you Islam as your religion (All that is mentioned in the Hadith Jibril)” (5:3). 

Because Jibril (a.s) was the one who brought down this verse to the Messenger, Allah inspired him to prepare the Prophet (saws) and the Ummah for what it meant, by first visiting them and instructing them on all the aspects of the Deen so they wouldn’t be forgotten.

So there is no room to say the hadith is missing any part of what Islam is, and to deny any part of it is to deny what Allah revealed, which is Kufr of the Deen because the Prophet (saws) said “He was Jibril who came to you to teach you your deen” affirming its place and significance in the religion.

The holy Prophet Muhammad (saws) had four Prophetic duties mentioned in the holy Qur’an: “Certainly did Allah confer [great] favor upon the believers when He sent among them a Messenger from themselves, reciting to them His verses and purifying them and teaching them the Book and wisdom, although they had been before in manifest error.”(3:164)

His role to purify was to raise people to a state where they could worship Allah as if they saw him, and each companion achieved according to His capacity. The Prophet (saws) said, “Abu Bakr does not precede you for praying much or fasting much, but because of a secret that has taken root in his heart.”(Ahmad with a sound chain) 

And restrain thyself with those who call upon their Lord at morning and evening, desiring His countenance, and let not thine eyes turn away from them, desiring the adornment of the present life; and obey not him whose heart We have made neglectful of Our remembrance so that he follows his own lust, and his affair has become all excess”. (18:28)

361f1dd7da24fe2a67de7ff1ed8905f5Imam Suhrawardi’s Islamic Sources

There is a body of Qur’anic verses and Aahdith, which the Imam clearly knew, that gave rise to this structure of particles in the universe such as the verse of light and the ahadith regarding the first thing Allah created, the pen and the intellect, to which the scholars explained the pen and the intellect are the same thing and both are Light. Some of these narration’s the imam relied upon, we have quoted, while many others we haven’t for the sake of being brief.

Ibn `Umar narrated that the Prophet said: “Allah the Exalted created creation in a darkness (fi zulmatin); then He cast upon them from His Light. Whoever was touched by that Light, he is guided, and whoever was missed by it is misguided. Therefore I say that the Pen is dry (and all is) in Allah’s foreknowledge.” (Narrated by Tirmidhi, Ahmad, Tabarani, al-Hakim and Bayhaqi )

Abdullah ibn Amr narrated: I heard Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) saying: Verily Allah created the elements of man in darkness and then He “infused” into them His light. He who received this light (and then made use of it) received the right guidance and he who erred was led astray. That is why I say that the Pen has no more to write about Allah’s knowledge. (Ahmad and Tirmidhi).

Imam Nawawi said in Sharh Sahih Muslim, in his commentary on the Prophet’s du`a which begins: “O Allah, you are the light of the heavens and the earth and yours is all praise…” (Book of Salat al-musafirin #199): The scholars said that the meaning of “You are the light of the heavens and the earth” is: You are the One who illuminates them and the Creator of their light. Abu `Ubayda said: “Its meaning is that by Your light the dwellers of the heavens and the earth obtain guidance”. (“Allah guides to His light whom He wills”(24:35)) 

“Ibn `Arabi al-Maliki in his commentary on Tirmidhi entitled `Aridat al- ahwadhi (10:108) confirmed the latter’s grading of Hasan and comments on the hadith”: “It is clear from it that each one receives of that Light to the extent of what he has been granted out of the general and the specific… in the heart and in the limbs.”

The Prophet said: “The angels were created from light, the jinn from smokeless fire (Thermal energy), and Adam from what was described to you (i.e. in the Qur’an).”

Many sources can be quoted to illustrate the quantum structure the Imam mentioned but one hadith in particular mentions it literally. The judgments on this narration vary greatly among the scholars, it has received many different gradings, many prominent scholars said it is fabricated others said it’s chain (of narration) was merely Dai’f (weak) and other prominent scholars mentioned it was Sahih. To avoid a discussion on authenticity for the sake of being brief, we can simply take it is fabricated but different scholars relied upon it according to how they graded it. We are quoting it here to sum up in a few words the body of knowledge in Islam that alludes to what many of Islams major scholars mentioned over the centuries:

Shaykh al Islam Ibn Hajr al-Haythami, the Major Imam that later Mujtahid scholars of the Shafii Madhhab (rah) followed, narrates in his Fatawa al Hadithiyyah:

Undoubtedly Abdur Razzaq mentioned with his Sanad from Jabir ibn `Abd Allah who asked: “O Messenger of Allah, may my father and mother be sacrificed for you, tell me of the first thing Allah created before all things.” He said: “O Jabir, the first thing Allah created was the light of your Prophet from His light, and that light remained (lit. “turned”) in the midst of His Power for as long as He wished, and there was not, at that time, a Tablet or a Pen or a Paradise or a Fire or an angel or a heaven or an earth.  And when Allah wished to create creation, he divided that Light into four parts and from the first made the Pen, from the second the Tablet, from the third the Throne, [and from the fourth everything else] (Narrated by Imam Ibn Hajr al Haytami in Fatawa al Hadithiyyah Page No. 289)

فقد أخرج عبد الرزاق بسنده عن جابر بن عبد الله الأنصاري رضي الله عنهما قال: “قلت: يا رسول الله بأبي أنت وأمي أخبرني عن أوّل شيء خلقه الله قبل الأشياء؟ قال: يا جابر إن الله خلق قبل الأشياء نور نبيك محمد صلى الله عليه وسلّم من نوره فجعل ذلك النور يدور بالقدرة حيث شاء الله، ولم يكن في ذلك الوقت لوح ولا قلم ولا جنة ولا نار ولا ملك ولا سماء ولا أرض ولا شمس ولا قمر ولا إنس ولا جن، فلما أراد الله تعالى أن يخلق الخلق قسم ذلك النور أربعة أجزاء: فخلق من الجزء الأوّل القلم، ومن الثاني اللوح، ومن الثالث العرش، ثم قسم الجزء الرابع أربعة أجزاء: فخلق من الأول حملة العرش، ومن الثاني الكرسي، ومن الثالث باقي الملائكة

Imam Abd al-Razzaq narrates that Jabir (May Allah be pleased with him) said:  “I said: O Messenger of Allah, may my father and mother be sacrificed for you, tell me of the first thing Allah created before all things”. He said: “O Jabir, the first thing Allah created was the light of your Prophet from His light, and that light remained (lit or “turned”) in the midst of His Power for as long as He wished, and there was not, at that time, a Tablet or a Pen or a Paradise or a Fire or an angel or a heaven or an earth or a sun or a moon or a jinn or a man. 

And when Allah wished to create creation, he divided that Light into four parts and from the first made the Pen, from the second the Tablet, from the third the Throne, and then he divided the fourth [part] into four [other] parts and from the first he created the bearer of the Throne, from the second the Chair (Kursi), from the third the rest of the angels. Then He divided the fourth into four other parts and created from the first the heavens, and from the second the earth, and from the third the Paradise and the Fire, and then he divided the fourth into four parts and created from the first the Light in the believers visions, and from the second the light of their hearts which is knowledge of Allah, and from the third the light of their inner harmony (‘Uns) which is the Tawheed ‘There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, etc…”. (Abd al-Razzaq (d. 211) narrates it in his Musannaf according to Qastallani in al-Mawahib al-laduniyya (1:55) and Zarqani in his Sharh al-mawahib (1:56 of the Matba`a al-`amira edition in Cairo). There is no doubt as to the reliability of `Abd al-Razzaq as a narrator. Bukhari took 120 narrations from him, Muslim 400., We do not have the entire Musnad of Abd al-Razzaq in our hands, the 11 volumes presently published are not the entire work).

Essentially the first particles create other particles and so one, if we keep in mind the verse of Light and its similitude “Allah is the Light of the heavens and the earth. The example of His light is like a…”(24:35) we can see how close the scholars of Islam came to explaining the universe and the existence of quantum particles, and the mistake of literalism in relation to the light of Allah. 

The fundamental forces of the universe carried by semi particles, and the elementary particles are essentially in descriptive terms “Light”.

Allah brought forth his creation from the darkness of non-existence out into the knowledge of existence so it could know him, our study of the universe is that knowing. “In time We shall make them fully understand Our messages [through what they perceive] in the utmost horizons [of the universe] and within themselves, so that it will become clear unto them that this [revelation] is indeed the truth.”[Qur’an 41:53]

The Prophet (saws) said “The first thing that Allah created was the Intellect,”[Tirmidhi]. He also said, “The first thing that Allah created was the Pen,” and “The first thing Allah created was my Light.” The scholars said this amounts to the same thing, by similitude, the Pen the Intellect, the Light, can be understood as the light of our intellect that imagines the sum of our knowledge, this relates to the fact Allah created man in his own image, and the understanding that Allah also created creation in the likeness of his attributes. Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) said: The first thing which Allah created was the Pen. He commanded it to write. It asked: What should I write? He said: Write the Decree (al-Qadr). So it wrote what had happened and what was going to happen up to eternity. (Tirmidhi) basically for the remainder of existence.

The scholars understood it in this manner because the first intellect is the primordial (Ancient) light in its passive aspect as a recipient of Allah’s knowledge, of what is to be, essentially Allah created Light and placed with it His knowledge and commanded it to write/record that knowledge. While the Pen is the primordial (Ancient) light in its active aspect of writing this knowledge on the Guarded Tablet at Allah’s command (The “Pen” is always understood as a simile by the scholars). 

The Prophet (saws) said “The first thing that Allah created was the Pen and He said to it: Write! So it wrote what is to be forever.”(Tabarani and Abu Nu’aym) 

The Prophet (saws) said, “The first thing created by Allah was the pen, then, He ordered it to write, so it wrote everything that will happen till the Day of Judgment.” (narrated by Tirmidhi, Abu-Dawud, and Ahmad). 

This Hadith is narrated in another way by Imam Bukhari, the Messenger of Allah (saws) says, “Allah (swt) said to the pen write my knowledge about my creatures until the Day of Judgment.” When Allah (swt) commanded it to right it wrote the knowledge He gave it.

The Pen, Light, Intellect as well as the light of prophethood that shines from a prophets face all amount to the same thing in what they are (a the type of light from the first light’s Allah created), and from the light of the intellect, all of the universe, with all its varied forms and meanings unfolded as Allah willed. Imam al Ghazali said in his Mishkat al Anwar (Niche of Lights) Allah created the Angels from the Light of the Intellect.

Voila_Capture 2015-09-11_02-42-48_pm

[Note 1:The new portrait precisely pegs the age of the universe at 13.7 billion years, with a remarkably small one percent margin of error (According to NASA). They observed light emitted when the universe was 13+ billion years younger than it is today.

They found that the big bang and Inflation theories continue to ring true. The contents of the universe include 4 percent atoms (ordinary matter), 23 percent of an unknown type of dark matter, and 73 percent of a mysterious dark energy. The new measurements even shed light on the nature of the dark energy, which acts as a sort of anti-gravity.] [Note 2: A full-sky map of the oldest light in the universe. Colors indicate “warmer” (red) and “cooler” (blue) spots. The oval shape is a projection to display the whole sky; similar to the way the globe of the earth can be represented as an oval.]

Shaykh Abd al-Qadir al Gilani, (d. 561) in his book Sirr al-Asrar fi ma Yahtaju Ilayh al-Abrar said: “Know that since Allah first created the soul of Muhammad (essentially the soul is a form of Light) from the light of His beauty, as He said: I created Muhammad from the light of My Face, and as the Prophet said: The first thing Allah created is my soul (not the literal human soul), and the first thing Allah created is the Pen, and the first thing Allah created is the intellect. What is meant by all this is one and the same thing, and that is the haqiqa muhammadiyya. However, it was named a light because it is completely purified from darkness, as Allah said: There has come to you from Allah a Light and a manifest Book. It was also named an intellect because it is the cause for the transmission of knowledge, and the pen is its medium in the world of letters. The Muhammadan soul (al-ruh al-muhammadiyya) is therefore the quintessence of all created things and the first of them and their origin, as the Prophet said: I am from Allah and the believers are from me, and Allah created all souls from me in the spiritual world and He did so in the best form. It is the name of the totality of mankind in that primordial world, and after its creation by four thousand years, Allah created the Throne from the light of Muhammad himself (saws), and from it the rest of creation.”

The “Haqiqa Muhammadiyya” is always referred to when mentioning the hadith of Jabir that Imam Suhrawardi used, and he was a person who practiced tasawwuf so no doubt he knew and understood it. Among the people of Tasawwuf the understanding and knowledge of the “Haqiqa Muhamadiya” is widely known, but Imam Suhrawardi in his works took this a step further and elaborated on the whole process of creation, meaning the extent to which he relied on original ideas from outside of Islam is not as extensive as academics have thought, most prominent scholars who practice Tasawwuf speak of it.

Regarding the Haqiqa (reality) in relation to man, Allah created man in his image which Imam Ibn al Arabi explained, but he chose specific perfected forms for aspects of it from various prophets (saws). 

The prophet (saws) said “The people of Paradise will enter Paradise in the most perfect and beautiful form, in the form of their father Adam (in the general sense), whom Allaah created with His own hand and perfected his form and made his shape beautiful (this doesn’t mean our faces will look the same). Everyone who enters Paradise will be in the form of Adam” (Bukhari). 

And in another narration, They will enter paradise the same age as Isa (as) 33 years old (Book of the End, Ibn Katheer), the scholars did not take the soul mentioned by Shakh abdul Qadir al Jilani in its literal sense as the human soul we know, (“The first thing that Allah created was my light”) the souls of humans where created later which Imam Suhrawardi stipulates, but this first created light is spoken of in the descriptive sense as a form of active light, not simply photons.

Regarding the prophets (saws) words “I am from Allah and the believers are from me, and Allah created all souls from me in the spiritual world and He did so in the best form”, the first light Allah created was not a literal Human soul it was a substance similar to light, as one quantum particle in descriptive terms is similar to another, light is this substances similitude, from it other matter was created and so on until eventually Allah created the human soul in the best of forms, on the form of the prophet Muhammads (saws) soul originating from the light it originated from, because in life He was the one who achieved the most nearness to him through his soul. 

The role of the soul is similar to the intellect, while the intellects role is to gain knowledge and know creation the soul’s role is to know Allah and the unseen quantum world, which it is constantly witnessing, and our hearts look at what it sees (Imam al Ghazali). The prophet (saws) was the best of creation, Adam was the first man and Isa (Jesus) was unique in his purity because he did not have a father, we will have the form of Adam when we enter jannah (heaven), be the same age as Isa (as), meaning in the best of paths, and our souls are originated from the light the prophet muhammad’s soul originated from, who achieved the most nearness to Him. The words “from me” essentially mean from what Allah granted “me”, Allah was its creator and this isn’t referring to lineage, the language is descriptive of the moments of creation.

“O people of the Book! There hath come to you our Messenger, revealing to you much that ye used to hide in the Book, and passing over much. There hath come to you from Allah a light and a perspicuous Book (Qur’an 5:15).

Imam Alusi (rah) said in his tafsir: 

وكونه صلى الله عليه وسلم رحمة للجميع باعتبار أنه عليه الصلاة والسلام واسطة الفيض الإلهي على الممكنات على حسب القوابل، ولذا كان نوره صلى الله عليه وسلم أول المخلوقات، ففي الخبر ” أول ما خلق الله تعالى نور نبيك يا جابر ” وجاء ” الله تعالى المعطي وأنا القاسم ” وللصوفية قدست أسرارهم في هذا الفصل كلام فوق ذلك،

 

Translation: “The Prophet being a mercy to all is linked to the fact that he is the intermediary of the divine outpouring over all contingencies [i.e. all created things without exception], from the very beginnings (wasitat al-fayd al-ilahi `ala al-mumkinat `ala hasab al-qawabil), and that is why his light was the first of all things created, as stated in the report that “The first thing Allah created was the light of your Prophet, O Jabir,” and also cited is: “Allah is the Giver and I am the Distributor.” (Tafsir Ruh al-Ma`ani, Volume 017, Page No. 105)

Among the scholars who said : “What is meant by a Light is: Muhammad, Blessings and peace upon him.” are, Imam Suyuti in Tafsir al-Jalalayn, Imam Fayruzabadi in the Tafsir Ibn `Abbas entitled Tanwir al-miqbas (p. 72), Shaykh al-Islam Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, the Mujaddid of the sixth century, in his Tafsir al-kabir (11:189), Imam al-Shirbini in his Tafsir entitled al-Siraj al-munir (p. 360), the author of Tafsir Abi Sa`ud (4:36), Imam Ibn al-Jawzi in Z’ad al Maseer fil Ilm at-Tafseer Under the verse 5:15. 

Imam Qurtubi and Mawardi (al-Nukat wa al-‘uyun, 2.22) mention that interpreting Nur as “Muhammad” (Allah bless him and give him peace) was also the position by the Imam of Arabic grammar Ibrahim ibn Muhammad al-Zajjaj (d. 311/923). [Ahkam al-Qur’an , 6.118]

This original light and “soul” is also said to be the light of prophethood that shone from each prophets face (saws), meaning this light wasn’t simply referring to photons but a more complex substance in the active sense which is why it was also called a soul (whose role was to know the unseen world). 

If we think of the light of Prophethood, the pen, and the light of the intellect, we can understand better what is being referred to, this type of light was similar to the light of the intellect we all see in our inner eye which “imagines” our knowledge as we think, it was shinning forth from all the prophets of Allah.

The scholars said the Ancient light is what is called the Light of the Prophet, may Allah’s blessings and peace be upon him, since he is the created being who received the major share of it, and it is also the Light of Prophethood granted to each prophet by which the people know them. The prophets message was sent to all mankind not simply muslims, he was a prophet to all humanity, this Last religion Allah sent would have to guide man for his remaining time on earth, which is more than any previous prophets time on earth, 1400 years so far, so his receiving the vast majority of it was because of his perfection and his role in life.

Abdullah Ibn Abbas (RA) explains the “Parable” of Allah’s Nur as:

مثل نوره نور محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم في أصلاب آبائه على هذا الوصف إلى

The Parable of Allah’s Nur is the Nur of Muhammad (The light of Prophethood) which was present in the loins of his forefathers (Tanwir al Miqbas, Min Tafsir Ibn Abbas, Page No. 376, Published by Maktaba al Asriyyah, Beirut, Lebanon)

The Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) said : “When my mother gave birth to me a Nur emerged from her which lit up the castles of Syria (By it she could see them from a distance) (Imam al-Bayhaqi in Dala’il an-Nubuwwa)

Abu Bakr al Baihaqi (rah) narrated from the mother of Uthman bin Abi al Aas (ra) that she witnessed the Haml (carying period) of Amina bint Wahb (ra) the prophets mother, and on the night of the birth she saw that there was nothing but Nur spread everywhere in the house and the stars had come so close to earth (because of it) that it was hard to comprehend (Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Volume 2, Page No. 164)

Sayyidna Arbaz Bin Sariyah (r.a) narrated that the Sahaba asked (about the reality of Prophet). The Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) said: I was in front of Allah written as Khatam an Nabiyeen (seal of the prophets) in Umm ul Kitaab (the mother of books) when Adam (as) was intermingled between clay (and spirit) (while he was being created).  I am the prayer of Ibrahim (Peace Be Upon Him) and Isa (Peace Be Upon Him) gave glad tiding of my arrival to his nation. (The Prophet – Peace be upon him said): My mother saw such a Light (Nur) coming out from her body that it lit the castles of Syria. (Bayhaqi, Ahmad, Ibn Kathir in his tafseer, among others)

Abu Hurraira (ra) narrates from the Messenger of Allah (May Peace be upon him) that he said: When Allah created Adam (Peace be upon him) He informed him of his descendants, at this Adam (Peace be upon him) saw superiority of some over others, then he saw me towards the end in form of an “Illuminating Nur” (i.e. first to be created from Nur (light) but sent last to mankind), he (Adam) said: O my Lord who is this? The Lord replied: This is your son Ahmed who is the first and the last and (on the Day of Judgment) he will be the first to do intercession (for humanity). (Imam Bayhaqi in his Dalail an Nabuwwah: Volume 005, Page No. 483)

Imam Badr ud-din Ayni (rah) states in his Umdat al Qari, Sharh Sahih al Bukhari to the hadith “First of all, there was nothing but Allah, and (then He created His Throne). His throne was over the water” (Sahih Bukhari in English, Volume 4, Book 54, Number 414)

روى أحمد والترمذي مصححا من حديث عبادة بن الصامت مرفوعاً أول ما خلق الله القلم ثم قال أكتب فجرى بما هو كائن إلى يوم القيامة واختاره الحسن وعطاء ومجاهد وإليه ذهب إبن جرير وابن الجوزي وحكى ابن جرير عن محمد بن إسحاق أنه قال أول ما خلق الله تعالى النور والظلمة ثم ميز بينهما فجعل الظلمة ليلاً أسود مظلماً وجعل النور نهاراً أبيض مبصراً وقيل أو ما خلق الله تعالى نور محمد قلت التوفيق بين هذه الروايات بأن الأولية نسبي وكل شيء قيل فيه إنه أول فهو بالنسبة إلى ما بعدها

Imam Ahmed and Imam Tirimdhi have narrated the Marfu hadith with Sahih Isnad from Ibada bin Samit (ra) which proves that Allah first created the Pen and then told it to write and It wrote everything which would happen till day of Judgement. Hassan, Ata and Mujahid have adopted this too, Ibn Jarir and Ibn Jawzi also have this Madhab whereas Ibn Jarir has narrated from Muhammad bin Ishaq that “Allah created the Nur (light) and Darkness prior to everything” and then differentiated between them, There is also a saying that Allah first created “The Nur of Muhammad (saws)” so how could reconciliation be brought in these different narrations? I say that they could be reconciled by saying that everything has its “relative primacy” and they are first in relevance to things which came after them. (Umdat al Qari, Sharh Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume No. 15, Page No. 109)

Mullah Ali Qari (rah) beautifully said: Being first is amongst the matters of “Idhafiyah” hence the interpretation will be done that these things (i.e. Qalam, Aql, Nur, Ruh, Arsh etc…) are first according to their own “Jinss” (type or kind)… The Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: “The First thing which Allah created was my Nur” and It has also come in another report that It was his “Ruh” (soul) and both of them “Have the same meaning because spirits (in general) are created from nur”(Mullah Ali Qari in Mirqat, Sharh al-Mishqaat (1/290))

“This (first) light was the origin of the lights of all other Divine Messengers, of the Angels, then of all other beings. This is how and why the Prophet, may Allah’s blessings and peace be upon him, could say, “I was a Prophet when Adam was still between spirit and body.” (Tirmidhi, Ahmad, Hakim and Bukhari in Tarikh) The power of this light made the Prophet’s radiation (the light he radiated) so powerful, once he appeared on earth, that Allah calls him in the Qur’an “an illuminating lamp.”(33:46) “He is an Illuminating lamp for the intellect, and the Qur’an is like the Sun for it, directing man to the rest of creation” (unseen and seen) (Imam al Ghazali). Rubayyi (r.a), when asked to describe the Prophet (saws), said, “My son, had you seen him, you would have seen the sun shining.” (Tirmidhi)

Anas (r.a) reports: “The day the Nabi (saws) came (migrated) to Madinah, everything in Madinah became illuminated. (a natural illumination, was felt, when the anwaar increased, it could be felt. In the dark nights of Ramadaan many times because of the intensity of the anwaaraat (illuminations)). The day when Rasulullah (saws) passed away, ‘everything of Madinah became dark. We had not yet dusted off the dust from our hands after the burial of Rasulullah (saws) when we began to feel the change in our hearts.”(Tirmidhi, Ahmad, Ibn Maaja)

If we keep in mind all these definitions we can understand what Imam Abu Abdullah Ibn al-Haaj al-Maliki related about this matter, “The first thing Allah created is the light (Nur) of Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him), and that light came and prostrated before Allah. Allah divided it into four parts and created from the first part the Throne, from the second the Pen, from the third the Tablet, and then similarly He subdivided the fourth part into parts and created the rest of creation. Therefore the light of the Throne is from the light of Muhammad , the light of the Pen is from the light of Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him), the light of the Tablet is from the light of Muhammad , the light of day, the light of knowledge, the light of the sun and the moon, and the light of vision and sight are all from the light of Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him). [al-Madkhal, Volume 002, Page No. 32-3]

The Light of Prophethood was seen on the prophets father Abdullah (r.a) when he was to marry Aminah (r.a) the prophets mother. On His way to Her tribe the Bani Zuhra, He passed by a Jewish soothsayer named Fatima, she propositioned him because she saw the light of prophethood shining from his forehead and she was hoping that she would conceive this honorable Prophet. 

Abdullah (ra) replied, “Regarding haram, death is better, And I don’t see any halal in sight,  And about what you are asking for, An honourable one must protect his honor and religion.” Abdullah (ra) married, Aamina (ra), who was then the best woman in Quraish, both in lineage and birth. They became husband and wife on Monday, and she conceived the Prophet (saw). The next day, Abdullah (ra) went out and passed by the woman who proposed to him earlier. He asked her, “Why don’t you offer me what you offered me yesterday?” She replied, “The light that you were carrying yesterday has left you; therefore I have no need for you today. I was hoping to have that light in me, but Allah (swt) willed it to be put elsewhere.” 

The sister of Waraqa bin Nawfal (ra), Umm Qatal similarly saw Light between the eyes of Abdullah (ra) before he had gone onto his wife Amina (ra), and she had proposed to him too, her brother (Waraqa bin Nawfal) had told her that a mighty Prophet would be born from Abdullah (ra) therefore it was a desire of Umm Qatal that the Nabi is born through her, however the Nur was transferred into Amina (r.a) (Ibn Kathir in Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah)

Abdullah Ibn Abbas narrated: That I said ‘O’ Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him), my mother and father be sacrificed for you, where were you at the time Adam was in heaven, He said that the Prophet (saws) smiled so that his teeth became clear then he said I was in the loin of Adam (this differentiates from the prophet himself from the Light Allah created and his being a prophet when Allah was creating Adam) and then in the loin of my father Noah (saws) then I was taken on a ship then my Light was put into the loin of Abraham (saws) my parents (lineage) were never given to me except through those who did Nikah (married) I was always transferred to pure people. In the Torah and the Bible was my name mentioned, every Prophet of Allah mentioned my blessings, With my Light (Nur) the morning would light up and the people (would) get clouds giving shadow due to me, and Allah granted me one of his names, He is Mehmood al Arsh, and I am Muhammad, and Allah promised me Hoodh al-Kowthar (river from Jannah) and he made me the first Intercessor and I will be the first person who’s Intercession will be accepted, and Allah gave me birth in the best time of mankind, the people of my Ummah are those who praise Allah, they ask to do good deeds and stop from sins. (Ibn Asakir, Tarikh Madina-Damishq Volume 003, Page No. 408, the original translation was not clear and some corrections where made).

The souls of all Humans where created much later than the beginning of the universe, the light of Prophethood intended for each prophet, was created before Adam was created, this is how the Prophet (saws) was a prophet before Allah finished creating Adam, referring to the light of prophethood. It was a reference to this light not him as a person, he mentioned it as “him” in the sense that its qualities of prophethood where his. The Quran says “he speaks nothing of his own desire”, telling us something about his personality and the degree to which it agreed with what Allah wanted, hence he used this language. But since All these things and the rest of creation where created from the first “light” in a successive order, different names where given to similar things according to their function (role).

75e0170f2f167d9a2ee5ceb9f5463dd3Creation is the Veil of Form of Allah’s Attributes

Because one particle is created from another smaller particle and matter as well as the objects in the universe are created from these particles and ultimately life itself, and this all began with  Nur al Anwar (Light of Lights), if we keep in mind what Imam Ibn al Arabi said about Allah creating man in his image, it becomes clear that all objects and beings in creation are the veils of form, of Allah’s attributes. 

Seeing the sings of Allah in creation is to understand the meaning Allah has placed behind what is occurring in life.

Allah says: Allah is the light of the heavens and the earth; a likeness of His light is as a niche in which is a lamp, the lamp is in a glass, (and) the glass is as it were a brightly shining star, lit from a blessed olive-tree, neither eastern nor western, the oil whereof almost gives light though fire touch it not– light upon light– Allah guides to His light whom He pleases, and Allah sets forth parables for men, and Allah is Cognizant of all things.(Surah Nur, 24. Ayah 35)

The physical meaning and representation of this verse has been given but the meaning of this structure Allah placed in the universe which represents his attributes is also represented in the way Allah created man in his Image, His image is a totality of the attributes in creation, He ended the verse by saying “Allah guides to His light whom He pleases, and Allah sets forth parables for men” connecting the verse to mans guidance, through what He mentioned of the universe, in the form of a parable. 

Allah created the Universe in a manner that his creations could know it and each other through it, He created the jinn with one hand and created mankind with both as Imam Ibn al Arabi explained. 

Imam al Ghazali explained what Imam Ali meant when he said “The vision of the eye is limited; the vision of the heart transcends all barriers of time and space”, this is so the heart is not limited by what it sees and it’s vision can reach the furthest reaches of space (many prophet were given sight of the Arsh of Allah from earth). Both Imam Ibn al Arabi and Imam Ghazali said this vision is distorted in sinful people who don’t receive much light to see with, they explained that the reason why Allah created creation from his light as it “unfolded” in time after the first moment of the big bang, was because on a quantum level through the entanglement of particles (similarity of substances and nature of our bodies to distant objects) they could connect to each other spiritually regardless of distance (the explanation is stated in simple terms and may be falling short in some regards). 

Keeping in Mind that quantum entanglement (as the name describes) means that any two particles irrespective of distance in space can be connected to each other, and “Nonlocality” (which occurs because of entanglement) describes the apparent ability of objects to instantaneously know about each other’s state, even when separated by large distances (potentially even billions of light years, almost as if the universe at large instantaneously arranges its particles in anticipation of future events), this aspect of creation is spoken of in the works of Imam al Ghazali (r.a) and can be understood from the saying of Imam Ali “The vision of the eye is limited; the vision of the heart transcends all barriers of time and space”. 

More recently mathematicians are showing that entanglement between parts of large systems having thousands (or trillions) of particles is the norm, rather than being a rare and short-lived relationship, researchers are also suggesting the entanglement of the universe occurred at the time of the big bang, from this we know that Quantum Entanglement drives the arrow of time, and that Large-scale entanglement guides how our world evolves, often in crucial ways. Experiments are also showing that “Quantum Entanglement benefits” exist even after the links are broken, reasonable or not, entanglement indeed appears to be a part of reality.

What this points to is the deeper interconnectedness of the universe that this greater meaning in life is born from and can be understood, “and Allah is Cognizant of all things” (24:35) an attribute of his reflected in the universe. 

In relation to entanglement at the first stages of creation, the Prophet (saws) said: “Allah the Exalted created creation in a darkness (fi zulmatin); then He cast upon them from His Light. Whoever was touched by that Light, he is guided, and whoever was missed by it is misguided. Therefore I say that the Pen is dry (and all is) in Allah’s foreknowledge.” (Tirmidhi)

This ability to understand the greater meaning behind things which Imam Suhrawardi tried to explain in his works referring to the light of the hearts ability to see the Haq (reality) of something and it’s true nature, is taken from the hearts ability to encompass and know the reality of things in its vision which we know through what we sense and feel about moments and things in life. 

Allah in a Hadith Qudsi says: “My earth and My heaven do not encompass Me, but the heart of My servant who has faith does encompass Me.” (Ihya Ullum al Deen, Imam al Ghazali) Often this was summarized by Scholars in the briefer formula “The heart of the person of faith is the Throne of the All-Merciful”, Qalb al-mu’min ‘arsh al-Rahman

This is another way of understanding the hadith “Allah created man in his Image”. Allah said “He knows what is before them and what is behind them, while they cannot encompass Him with their knowledge.” (20.110) man can not encompass Allah with knowledge but his heart can encompass qualities and attributes from which he interprets the world around him and derives knowledge. 

There is a difference between information, knowledge, understanding and wisdom, wisdom comes from qualities we embody in our hearts. Knowledge is abundant in our time but it has been reduced to mere information and facts, a list of points about a topic. When one goes beyond facts and information they gain knowledge of an issue, after they have reached this point only then they can begin to have an understanding of the wider aspects of the topic in relation to the wider world, if the individual has wisdom, when this is combined with understanding they become sagacious and can see it in context with the greater picture of life. This is how man (such as the prophets) can surpass the Angels in perfection and wisdom but not knowledge.

To better understand this we have to refer back to the works of the scholars who spoke about it in more depth, but this explanation should be sufficient (insha allah). 

This meaning behind the structure of the universe Allah mentioned in the verse of Light (24:35) was spoken of and explained in relation to the prophet (saws) himself by the companions and the scholars, who was mankind’s perfect representation, as Man was created in Allah’s Image. The Key to understand what they said is to keep in mind that Allah mentioned in relation to the verse, at the end, that “Allah guides to His light whom He pleases” which was in part the reason He spoke about it. The companions Ka’b al-Ahbar (ra) and Ibn Jubayr (ra) said: By the second light He (Allah) means Muhammad (Peace be upon him). Allah said “The Likeness of his light” this refers to the Nur of Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) (Ash-Shifa bi Tarif al Haquq al Mustafa, Page No. 6) (which is also in agreement with the origin of the light of Prophethood)

Sahl bin Abdullah (ra) said that (the metaphor) means that Allah is the “guide” of creation in the heavens and the earth, he then said: Like the Light of Muhammad (Peace be upon him) when it is lodged in the loins (of his forefathers) like a niche. By the Lamp he means his heart. The glass is his breast. It is as if it were a glittering star because of the belief and wisdom it contains, kindled from a blessed tree, i.e. from the light of Ibrahim (a.s). He makes a comparison with the blessed tree and He says: “Its oil would nearly shine” i.e. Muhammad (salallaho alaihi wasalam)’s prophecy is evident to the people even before he speaks just like the oil. (Ash-Shifa bi Tarif al Haquq al Mustafa, Page No. 6)

Imam Ibn Kathir (Rahimuhullah) says under this ayah in his Tafsir,

وقال شمر بن عطية: جاء ابن عباس إلى كعب الأحبار فقال: حدثني عن قول الله تعالى: { يَكَادُ زَيْتُهَا يُضِىۤءُ وَلَوْ لَمْ تَمْسَسْهُ نَارٌ } قال: يكاد محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم يبين للناس، ولو لم يتكلم أنه نبي؛ كما يكاد ذلك الزيت أن يضيء

Ibn Abbas (ra) went to Ka’b al-Ahbar (ra) and asked him to explain Allah’s saying: “whose oil is well-nigh luminous”, Ka’b (ra)  said: It is an (example of) Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) i.e. He is evident to people as a Prophet even if he had not declared his Nubuwah, just like the olive oil glows even without being lit. (Tafsir Ibn Kathir, Volume No.3, Page No. 490, under 24:35)

Imam al-Baghwi (Rahimuhullah) explains:

فقال بعضهم: وقع هذا التمثل لنور محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم، قال ابن عباس لكعب الأحبار: أخبرني عن قوله تعالى: { مَثَلُ نُورِهِ كَمِشْكَاةٍ } فقال كعب: هذا مثل ضربه الله لنبيه صلى الله عليه وسلم، فالمشكاة صدره، والزجاجة قلبه، والمصباح فيه النبوة، توقد من شجرة مباركة هي شجرة النبوة، يكاد نور محمد وأمره يتبين للناس ولو لم يتكلم أنه نبي كما يكاد ذلك الزيت يضيء ولو لم تمسسه نار.

Some (scholars) said: This similitude refers to Nur of Muhammad (salallaho alaihi wasalam), Ibn Abbas (ra) asked Kab al-Ahbar (ra) to explain Similitude of Nur, at which he replied: Allah has mentioned his Prophet (Peace be upon him) as a parable in this ayah, Mishkat refers to the chest of Prophet (saw), Glass refers to his heart, and Misbah refers to his Nabuwah and the wording “whose oil is well-nigh luminous” means that even if Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) had not declared himself a Prophet still his Nur would have glowed proving to people that he is a Nabi. (Ma’lim at Tanzil by Imam Baghawi, Under 24:35)

By similitude to the Prophet (saws) himself about who Allah said “Say, “I am only a man like you, to whom has been revealed that your god is one God.” (18:110) this verse in relation to Man means, Allah is the “guide” of creation, the heavens and the earth: Like the Light of Mankind when it is lodged in the loins (of his forefathers) like a niche. By the Lamp he means Man’s heart. The glass is his breast. It is as if it were a glittering star because of the belief and wisdom it contains, kindled from a blessed tree, i.e. from the light of Adam (a.s) and his ancestry. He makes a comparison with the blessed tree and He says: “Its oil would nearly shine” that is, Man’s vice-regency on earth is evident to the other beings in creation even before he speaks just like the oil.

Or: Man in his being is a parable in this ayah, Mishkat refers to his chest, Glass refers to his heart, and Misbah refers to his Vice-regency and the wording “whose oil is well-nigh luminous” means that even if Man had not declared himself a Vicegerent still his Nur (Light) would have glowed proving to the rest of creation that he is Allah’s vicegerent on Earth. 

This is how Allah guides man with his light through his physiology, “We have explained in detail in this Qur’an, for the benefit of mankind, every kind of similitude: but man is, in most things, contentious” (18:54)

Imam Ibn al Arabi elaborated on mans reality saying: So if you have understood, I have explained to you what is meant by “man”. Look at his grandeur through the Most Beautiful Names (of Allah, he was given), and the fact that they seek him (Allah’s other beings the Jinn and Angels) Through their seeking him (and their requiring his existence) you will come to understand his majesty, and through his appearance through them (as the Angels and Jinn support Him), you will understand his lowliness. So understand!

From this it is understood that he is a copy of the two forms Allah, and the Universe. (Imam Ibn al Arabi’s own summary of his work al Fusus al Ahkam).

922a8f2445b10860275ac847aa5844d41) Imam Ibn al Arabi On True Knowledge:

(The following should be understood in the context of knowledge gained in the way of Allah, and in relation to the saying of Aisha about the Prophet (saws) “He was a Walking Quran” and is relevant to understanding this work and what Imam Suhrawardi explained in his.)

How can true knowledge be obtained? What do we usually depend on when we want to know things, especially the reality of existence, and what is the role of our sense perception and rational consideration? Can the seeker of deeper insight gain this insight by what is generally called independent reasoning? (Ijtihad, or deductive contemplation) 

Shaykh Al-Akbar Imam Ibn al Arabi shows that whatever knowledge is acquired, reason is always bound to follow an authority (it holds to be true), for it cannot do otherwise. So what then is the best course to follow, that is which authority (or what the mind considers authoritative) can be trusted above others?

Imam Ibn al Arabi said: “The eye is never mistaken, neither it nor any of the senses. . . . The rational faculty perceives in two modes: through an inherent (dhati) perception in which it is like the senses, never being mistaken; and by a non-inherent perception. The second is what it perceives through its instruments (ala), which are reflection and (our) sense perception. 

Imagination follows the authority (taqlid/imitation) of that which (our) sense perception gives to it. Reflection considers imagination and finds therein individual things (mufradat). 

Reflection would love to configure a form to be preserved by the rational faculty (its sense of what sanity is). Hence it attributes some of the individual things to others (it confuses between things to maintain its sense of sanity and rationality, in spite of what the truth may be). In this attribution it may be mistaken concerning the actual situation, or it may be correct. Reason judges upon this basis, so it also may be mistaken or correct. Hence reason is a follower of authority, and it may make mistakes (as our sense of what is more authoritative about a matter can be misplaced). 

Since the Sufis (people of Tasawwuf) saw the mistakes of those who employ consideration, they turned to the path in which there is no confusion so that they might take things from the Eye of Certainty (ayn al-yaqin) and become qualified by certain knowledge. (“And worship your Lord until there comes to you the certainty”(15:99) 

Reason is full of meddling because (human) reflection governs over it, along with all the faculties within man, since there is nothing greater than reason in following authority (and what is authoritative). Reason imagines it has God-given proofs, but it only has proofs given by reflection. Reflection’s proofs let it take reason wherever it wants, while reason is like a blind man. No, it is even blinder in the path of Allah. The Folk of Allah do not follow the authority of their reflections (they continue to reflect), since a created thing should not follow the authority of another created thing. Hence they incline toward following Allah’s authority. They come to know Allah through Allah (as Imam Ali said about Maarifa, i Know Allah by (the Maarifa of) Allah), and He is as He says about Himself, not as meddlesome reason judges (and fails to comprehend what it doesn’t yet know). 

How is it proper for an intelligent man to follow the authority of the reflectivtive faculty, when he divides reflective consideration into correct and corrupt? Necessarily, he has need for a criterion (fariq) with which to separate the correct from the corrupt, but he cannot possibly distinguish between correct and corrupt reflective consideration through reflective consideration itself (what he reflects on is limited by what He doesn’t know, and he isn’t considering all there is to know). Necessarily, he has need for Allah in that. 

As for us, when we want to discern correct reflective consideration from the corrupt so that we may judge by it, we first have recourse to Allah, asking Him to bestow upon us knowledge of the object without the use of reflection. The Ummah (community) depends upon this and acts in accordance with it. This is the knowledge of the prophets, the friends (of Allah, saintly men) and the possessors of knowledge among the folk of Allah. They never transgress their places with their reflective powers. 

No one can have knowledge unless he knows things through his [its] own essence. Anyone who knows something through something added to his own essence is following the authority of that added thing in what it gives to him. Nothing in existence knows things through its own essence other than the One (Allah). The knowledge of things and not-things possessed by everything other than the One (Allah) is a following of authority (perceived to be authoritative). Since it has been established that other than Allah cannot have knowledge of a thing without following authority, let us follow Allah’s authority, especially in knowledge of Him. 

Why do we say that nothing can be known by other than Allah except through following authority? Because man knows nothing except through one of the faculties given to him by Allah: the senses and reason. Hence man has to follow the authority of his sense perception in that which it gives (him), and sense perception may be mistaken, or it may correspond to the situation as it is in itself. Or, man has to follow the authority of his rational faculty in that which it gives to him, either the incontrovertible (darura) or consideration. But reason follows the authority of reflection, some of which is correct and some of which is corrupt, so its knowledge of affairs, is by chance (bi’l-ittifaq). Hence there is nothing but following authority (and what we perceive authoritative). 

Since this is the situation, the intelligent man who wants to know Allah should follow His authority in the reports He has given about Himself in His scriptures and upon the tongues of His messengers. When a person wants to know the things, but he cannot know them through what his faculties give him, he should strive in acts of obedience (ta’at) until the Real (Haq) is his hearing, his seeing, and all his faculties (Allah says in a hadith Qudsi: “My servant continues to draw near to Me with supererogatory works so that I shall love him. When I love him I am his hearing with which he hears, his seeing with which he sees, his hand with which he strikes and his foot with which he walks. Were he to ask [something] of Me, I would surely give it to him, and were he to ask Me for refuge, I would surely grant him it”(Bukhari)). Then he will know all affairs through Allah and he will know Allah through Allah. In any case there is no escape from following authority, but once you know Allah through Allah and all things through Allah, then you will not be visited in that by ignorance, obfuscations (confusions), doubts or uncertainties. Thus have I alerted you to something which has never before reached your ear! 

The rational thinkers from among the people of consideration imagine that they know what consideration, sense perception, and reason have bestowed upon them, but they are following the authority of these things. Every faculty is prone to a certain kind of mistake. Though they may know this fact, they seek to throw themselves into error, for they distinguish between that within which sense perception, reason, and reflection may be mistaken and that within which it is not mistaken. But how can they know? Perhaps that which they have declared to be a mistake is correct. Nothing can eliminate this incurable disease, unless all a person’s knowledge is known through Allah, not through other than Him. Allah knows through His own Essence, not through anything added to It. Hence you also will come to know through that through which He knows, since you follow the authority of Him (Allah) who knows, who is not ignorant, and who follows the authority of no one. Anyone who follows the authority of other than Allah follows the authority of him who is visited by mistakes and who is correct only by chance. 

Someone may object: “How do you know this? Perhaps you may be mistaken in these classifications without being aware of it. For in this you follow the authority of that which can be mistaken: reason and reflection.” 

We reply: You are correct. However, since we see nothing but following authority, we have preferred to follow the authority of him who is named “Messenger” and that which is named “the Speech of Allah.” We followed their authority in knowledge until the Real was our hearing and our sight, so we came to know things through Allah and gained knowledge of these classifications through Allah. The fact that we were right to follow this authority was by chance, since, as we have said, whenever reason or any of the faculties accords with something as it is in itself, this is by chance. We do not hold that it is mistaken in every situation. We only say that we do not know how to distinguish its being wrong from its being right. But when the Real is all a person’s faculties and he knows things through Allah, then he knows the difference between the faculties’ being right and their being mistaken. This is what we maintain, and no one can deny it, for he finds it in himself. 

Since this is so, occupy yourself with following that which Allah has commanded you: practicing obedience to Him, examining (muraqaba) the thoughts that occur to your heart, shame (haya) before Allah, halting before His bounds, being alone (infirad) with Him, and preferring His side over yourself, until the Real is all your faculties, and you are (upon insight,12:108) in your affair (“Say, This is my way; I invite to Allah with insight, I and those who follow me. And exalted is Allah; and I am not of those who associate others with Him.”12:108). 

Thus have I counseled you, for we have seen the Real report about Himself that He possesses things which rational proofs and sound reflective powers reject, even though they offer proofs that the report-giver speaks the truth and people must have faith in what he says. So follow the authority of your Lord, since there is no escape from following authority! Do not follow your rational faculty in its interpretation (ta’wil)! 

By following the authority of Allah, the wayfarer thereby passes beyond mere following authority, for then the knowledge he has received through the revealed Law can be “verified” within himself. Thus “verification and realization” (tahqiq) (of what he has learned) completes and perfects following (taqlid). 

This Ummah (community) works toward acquiring something of what the divine reports have brought from the Real (Haq). They start to polish their hearts through invocations (Dhikr), reciting the Qur’an, freeing the locus (a center of activity, attention, or concentration, i.e the heart and self) from taking possible things into consideration, presence (hudur, being aware of your present self and behavior), and self-examination (muraqaba). They also keep their outward manifestation (the emotional states we fall into) pure by halting within the bounds (Fiqh) established by the Law (Deen), for example by averting the eyes from things such as private parts which it is forbidden to look upon and by looking at those things which bring about heedfulness (of Allah) and clear perception (Looking at unlawful things hinders perception). 

So also with the hearing, tongue, hand, foot, stomach, private parts, and heart (each unlawful thing hinders the faculty that carries it out). Outwardly there are only these seven, and the heart is the eighth. Such a person eliminates reflection from himself completely, since it disperses his singleminded concern (hamm, essentially his focus). He secludes himself at the gate of his Lord, occupying himself with examining his heart, in hopes that Allah will open the gate for him and he will come to know what he did not know, those things which the messengers and the Folk of Allah know and which rational faculties cannot possibly perceive on their own. 

When Allah opens the gate to the possessor of this heart, he actualizes (enlightens his iman as the prophet said to harithah) a divine self-disclosure which gives to him that which accords with its own properties. Then he attributes to Allah things which he would not have dared to attribute to Allah earlier. He would not have described Allah that way except to the extent that it was brought by the divine reports (He used to describe things from reading about them now He speaks from seeing them). He used to take such things through following (the written) authority. Now he takes them through unveiling which corresponds with and confirms for him what the revealed scriptures and the messengers have mentioned. He used to ascribe those things to Allah through faith and as a mere narrator, without verifying their meanings or adding to them. Now he ascribes them to Him within himself, with a verified knowledge because of that which has been disclosed to him. 

True knowledge cannot be other than unveiled by Allah to His creature, and this is a knowledge without the intermediary of reflection or any other faculty. It is a given, according to the saying, “Knowledge is a light which Allah throws into the heart of whomsoever He will.” 

Sound knowledge is not given by reflection, nor by what the rational thinkers establish by means of their reflective powers. Sound knowledge is only that which Allah throws into the heart of the knower. It is a divine light for which Allah singles out any of His servants whom He will, whether Angel, Messenger, Prophet, friend, or person of faith. He who has no unveiling has no knowledge (man la kashf lahu la’ilm lahu). (This was the way of Saydinah Khidr in guiding Musa (as) in the lessons mentioned in the Qur’an) (Futuhat al-Makkiyya by Imam Ibn `Arabi) 

2) Many sources where used in writing this work, at times quoted directly at others we have paraphrased, we have not cited them for spiritual reasons, this work was done feesabilillah.

Imam Maturidi and The Accident (Aradh) of Substance (Jawhar); Maturidi Aqeedah on Physics

5fb2f64fd49300d8f32e4af351eda762(Source: Adopted from a work written by br Dhul Qarnyan from an Islamic forum, it is an unfinished work)

For those familiar with the concepts surrounding ancient atomism and the notion of substance (Jawhar) and accident (Aradh), Islamic theology was distinguished for its view of substance (jawhar) itself being a kind of accident (Aradh). In the mind of Western commentators it was definitely for the worse as they saw Islamic physics as strange and ridiculous. Particles continuously being created and annihilated out of the void, substance was not substantial but was itself a transient arrangement of the interactions of a class of constitutive accidents, an idea which most closely corresponds to our modern idea of the four forces or interactions of nature. The driving motivation behind the development of these ideas was that it best upheld Islamic theology’s specific brand of occasionalistic monotheism.

Atomism in Islam is usually associated with Imam Ash’ari (ra), but Orthdox Islam was defined by the school’s of both Imam Ashari and Imam Maturid in Aqeedah. Imam Maturidi, like Imam Ashari, also made contributions to this doctrine by focusing on accidents (Aradh) rather than on substances (Jawhar).

Even though Imam Maturidi did not place as much of an emphasis on the quantum physics of the universe, preferring to emphasize the connection between man’s rationalism and God over the physical world and God as the more effective method in debating the particular heresies he ran into in Central Asia, he did use a coherent quantum model where necessary. Particularly when debating theologies such as those of the Manichean dualists (Philosophers). The Manicheists also tended to favor a materialist spin on dualism, talking about opposing flavors of “substances” (in the metaphysical sense of the word like jawhar or Leibniz’s understanding of Divinity) which were constantly in a struggle for supremacy over each other. They correlated to good (light) and evil (matter) and were the source of motion.

The polar opposite of this view was the general Neoplatonist viewpoint of other groups in Central Asia like the Shia Ismailis, or some of the pantheist/atheist philosophers. This view, based on Plato’s idealized forms, thought of the material world as a mere projection of the idealized world of forms (drawing strong comparisons to Descartes).

The understanding developed by Islamic scholars, initially the Mu’tazilah and later the Ash’ari’s was the Jawhar (atom), where the ideal principle of the world of creation was monistic, real, and also reflective of the description of Allah in the Qur’an (as having omnipotence over a quantified material world with ontological externality in the context of real existence). Imam Maturidi generally favored this view, especially some of the implications of the idea of a “rest accident” granting spatiotemporal meaning.

In general though he did not go far into detailing or trying to identify a particular elementary constituent substance. He spoke of matter in its colloquial, “continuous”, sense as we could hypothetically go about arbitrarily dividing it into “substance” ad infinitum without any empirical accountability. So he only did this as much as he needed to, he instead used the idea of “natures” or “taba’i”.

This was an expansion of existing ideas of “constitutive accidents” (a class of accidents common to all bodies, playing a role similar to substance but having no spatial reality of their own). Imam Maturidi used the term taba’i by which he referred to the “primary qualities” of bodies. They are part of the essential attributes of a thing.

The root of the word is the same as that of “tabeehat” which is used today to refer to one’s health.

The root Tab’ means nature, as well as pressure; it reflects an idea of animal instincts or four humors, on whose equilibrium Galen defined health.(279)

These natures corresponded to the ancient attributes of heat, cold, moisture, or dryness which were derived from the more familiar ancient idea of four elements (fire, water, earth, air). The essence of the relationship is what’s useful for Imam Maturidi, that they are in mutual opposition and have a divisive effect. On the other hand, their transient interactions are also seen as constructing all other accidents. He used this to argue against Manichean dualist metaphysics by pointing out that four natures were not enough, substances (in which the other four would interact constructively) had to be considered as a fifth principle, effectively negating any theology which tried to join dualism with materialism. Furthermore, he reasoned, there had to be yet another influence to explain the creation and interaction of such inherently opposite natures into the order we see in the world today.

Imam Maturidi compared this idea to humans and our own natures (i.e, fitrah). We have varying tendencies, dispositions, emotions, desires, etc and our rational mind controls and orchestrates them by weakening some and focusing others to form more coherent motivations.

This is similar to the “naturalistic panentheism” of Roman Stoics who posited an active God configuring passive matter composed of four elements however a strong distinction must be made between the idea of an “element” and Imam Maturid’s idea of a “nature”, the latter being a class of accident or ‘aradh and the former being a class of substance or jawhar. This translates into our understanding today of elementary particles and the fundamental forces of nature. Jawhar most literally correspond to elementary particles,(283) ‘aradh to the general idea of properties, states, or attributes and taba’i to the fundamental forces of nature.

The fundamental forces of nature, also called the fundamental interactions or interactive forces, also happen to be four. The electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, the strong nuclear force, and gravity. There is a remarkable and uncanny parallel between these and Imam Maturidi’s idea of natures which focused on them predominantly as constitutive interactions forming the fabric of material existence.

Imam Maturidi’s natures are, as mentioned, derived from the ancient elements. Though the ancient notion of element corresponds, in Stoic metaphysics and perhaps others, to the same way we use our modern elements today, they were not the same thing. Our elements can be more aptly called substances (only one kind of atom makes up each element). The ancient elements were a mixture of substances and accidents. Imam Maturidi didn’t use elements, he used their interactions which he called natures. If we think of natures as the tendencies or dispositions (dispositions is the word I use often as it most reflects the definition) then they obviously describe interactions. It doesn’t even matter what elements you use, but he (no doubt for convention when debating old religions) used the old four. So the natures were like dryness, moistness, heat, cold, etc. Each elemental nature was thus divided into specific polarized interactions, usually two opposite tendencies. There was also a sense of parity, or symmetry in their constructive interactions. The point is that the functional use thereof (and end result of his logic in using them) is the same as our modern concept of the fundamental interactions.

With regards to the current fundamental interactions of nature studied in physics, they too represent fields of interactions and separate forces themselves interact and in fact join in symmetry under higher energy conditions. The electromagnetic and weak nuclear force join to form the electroweak force. The electroweak and strong nuclear force join to form what’s known as the “Grand Unified Force” (of GUT or Grand Unified Theory). That combined with the force of gravity is known as “supergravity” which existed in the extremely high energy conditions near the Big Bang. In accordance with our view of energy, what Imam Maturidi said about only Allah being able to hold the divisive and opposite natures together in bodies becomes clear.

There was “spontaneous symmetry breaking” as the forces decoupled. The separation of gravity from the other unified force is associated with the beginning of “real” time (before this the dimension of time could have been spacelike or “imaginary” rather than timelike as we perceive it today). The symmetry breaking of the grand unified force into the strong nuclear force and electroweak force is associated with the inflationary epoch and reheating. This marks the start of the “electroweak epoch” or the radiation dominated era of the universe.

One of the most significant features of Imam Maturidi’s physics is the idea of the “rest accident of existence” granting spatio-temporal meaning (i.e, real existence and ontological externality within that context) which was the result of the constructive interaction of these natures. This is how substances, and in turn bodies, existed. This accident, being transient and fleeting, ultimately required constant “renewal” through Allah’s creating for anything to have sustained existence, even then Allah was involved in every aspect of the universe and this was just one.

The end of the electroweak epoch signified the breaking or decoupling of the weak nuclear force and electromagnetic force. Like the inflation field, there is a posited scalar field called the Higgs field.(284) The spontaneous electroweak symmetry breaking interacts with the Higgs field causing excitations in it which take the form of elementary particles (Goldstone bosons) which are absorbed by the elementary particles of other fields, giving them mass.(285) Thus begins the “matter dominated era” of the universe, when the fundamental particles acquired mass.

References

279 – Simko, Ivan (2008). Parallels of Stoicism and Kalam, University of Vienna

283 – And the Stoic notion of “element” would correspond to what we define as element today.

284 – In early inflationary cosmology, the inflaton field was thought to be the Higgs field.

285 – The Higgs boson would be a leftover elementary particle from this interaction. The elementary particles of the Higgs field are called, somewhat ironically in the context of this section, the “God particle”.

The Significance of Ash’ari Aqeedah and Theology According To The Qur’an and Sunnah 

7ae9cc419360e9810815e053dc17504fVery few places outside the lands that Islam began in, our prophet (saws) described as centers of knowledge we should seek, but Persia was such a place, Abu Hurairah (ra) narrated Allah’s Messenger (saw) as saying:”If the Religion were at the Pleiades (in Persia), even then a person (muslim) from Persia would have taken hold of it, or one amongst the Persian descent would surely have found it.” Persian lands under Islam became a great centre for knowledge and many of the worlds greatest scholars came from there like Imam al Ghazali, Imam Abu Dawwud, Imam Bukhari, Ibn Sina, Ibn Haytham one could name well over 200 prominent and well known Islamic figures (Scholars, Scientists, Philosophers, and Physicians) in world history that came from Persia, but Imam as-Suyuti (ra) remarked:”It has been communicated unanimously (there is Ijma or consensus) that this hadith refers to Imam Abu Hanifah (who was a Persian) and founded the Hanafi Madhhab (School of Law).”

Another centre of knowledge the prophet (saws) said we should seek even if it is the furthest place to travel to was China, The Prophet (saws) said “seek knowledge even unto china” (al-Munawi cites al-Dhahabi’s Talkhis in which he said it is a widely reported narration, some reports have chains that are weak, and some are sound),  Anas reported that Allah’s Apostle (saws) said, ” The Search of Knowledge is an obligation laid on every Muslim” (Ibn Majah and Baihaqi).

Another place we are advised to seek knowledge from was Yemen, The Prophet (saws) said “The people of Yemen have come to you, most sensitive in their souls, softest of hearts! Belief (Iman: Aqeedah or Theology) is from Yemen, wisdom is from Yemen! Pride and arrogance are found among the camel-owners; tranquility and dignity among the sheep-owners.”(Bukhari and Muslim)

The Prophet (saws) taught that we should seek out Iman and Aqeedah (Theology) from the people of Yemen and the Ashari’s specifically.  He (saws) did not teach any else the following words and when he offered it to others they did not accept it from him: Imran Ibn al-Husayn related, “I went in to see the Prophet after tying my camel at the gate. People from the Banu Tamim came in to see him. He said: ‘Accept the glad tidings, O Banu Tamim!’ They said: ‘You gave us glad tidings; now give us something tangible.’ This exchange took place twice. Then some from the people of Yemen came in to see him. He said: ‘Accept the glad tidings, O people of Yemen! (Abu Musa al-Ash’ari was leading them) for the Banu Tamim did not accept them.’ They said: ‘We accept, O Messenger of Allah!’ Then they said: ‘We came to ask you of this Great Matter.’ He said: ‘Allah was when nothing was other than Him. His Throne stood over the water. He wrote all things in the Remembrance. He created the heavens and the earth.’…Then someone (suddenly) called out: ‘Your camel has fled, O Ibn al-Husayn!’ I darted out and between me and my camel I could see a mirage. By Allah! How I wish that I had left it alone.”(Bukhari)

The significance of Allah teaching a specific people a knowledge is that when the prophet (saws) does this it will be established as a sunnah among them and their descendants.

Imam Al-Subki who was a Mijtahid (the Highest degree of scholarship) said: “Our scholars have said that the Prophet did not speak to anyone of the foundations of the Religion (usul al-Deen) in such a way as he has spoken to the Ash`aris in this hadith.”(Al-Subki, Tabaqat al-Shafi`iyya al-Kubra (3:364))

When Allah revealed this verse “O you who believe! Whoever among you turns back from his Religion, know that in his stead Allah will bring a people whom He loves and who love Him, humble toward believers, stern toward disbelievers, striving in the way of Allah, and fearing not the blame of any blamer. Such is the grace of Allah which He gives to whom He will. Allah is All-Embracing, All-Knowing.” (5:54) the Prophet pointed to Abu Musa al-Ash’ari (the Yemeni) and said: “They are that man’s People.”(Narrated from `Iyad by Ibn Abi Shayba and al-Hakim who said it is saheeh by Imam Muslim’s criterion, and by Imam al-Tabarani with a sound chain as stated by al-Haythami. This was also reported by Imam Suyuti in Tafsir al Jalalayn to verse 5:54 and in Tanwir al Miqbas min Tafsir Ibn Abbas, 5:54)

The Prophet (saws) said “‘Tomorrow shall come to you a people more sensitive in their hearts towards Islam than you.’ Then the Ash`aris came, among them Abu Musa al-Ash`ari. As they approached Madina they sang poetry, saying: ‘Tomorrow we meet our beloved ones, Muhammad and his group!’ When they arrived they began to shake hands with the people, and they were the first to innovate hand-shaking.”(Ahmad, Sahih)

Abu Hasan al Ashari (d.935) after whom the Ashari Aqeedah was named was a descendant of the companion Abu Musa al Ashari (d.672), he began as a Mu’tazili growing up as the step-son and student of the famous Mu’tazili teacher Abu Ali al-Jubba’i (d. 303/915). However, at the age of forty, he shocked everyone by severing himself from them and publicly renouncing their beliefs. He then set out to defend the beliefs the Ahl al-Sunna wa ‘l-Jama’a (Sunni Islam) held by its Great Jurists and Hadith scholars of the time.

Imam al-Ash’ari says: During the first ten days of one Ramadan, I saw Rasul Allah (saws). He said: “O ‘Ali, aid the madh’habs that are veritably reported by me (Those who follow my Sunnah), because only that is the Truth.” I woke up and was perplexed about this grave matter. I was immensely worried about this because I had numerous proofs opposing the ‘reported’ belief.

Within the next ten days, I saw him again. “What did you do about that which I ordered you to do?” I said: “Ya Rasul Allah, I tried to do it but I have many strong proofs

[and arguments] against those beliefs which are reported from you. Therefore, I follow that which has stronger proofs concerning [the Attributes] of Allah ta’ala” He said: “Aid the madh’habs that are reported from me, because that is the truth”

I woke up and I was terribly saddened. I then forsook Kalam [theology] and began following the Hadith and reciting the Qur’an.

In Basrah (Iraq) we have a custom that reciters (qurra’a) assemble together on the twenty seventh night of Ramadan and finish the entire Qur’an in that night. But I was feeling very sleepy and I couldn’t stay back any longer. So I went home and slept, feeling very sorry at the great loss of missing that night’s khatm (recitation).

I saw Rasul Allah (saws) who said “What did you do about that which I told you?” I replied: “I have forsaken Kalam and taken a firm hold of the Book of Allah and your sunnah.” He said: “I did not tell you to forsake Kalam (Theology). I told you to aid the madh’hab that is reported from me, because that is the truth.”

I said: “Ya Rasul Allah, how can I shun those ideas which I have helped in strengthening myself and aided its cause for the past thirty years, on the basis of a dream?”

He said: “If I did not know that Allah will aid you [in this], I would not have come here to explain all this. Do not make light of this dream in which I have come. Is that (dream) in which I saw Gibril, just another dream? I will not come again to you. Do well and Allah will aid you.”

I woke up and said to myself: only falsehood remains after truth has been manifest. So I began to advocate Hadith about seeing Allah, intercession etc. And I have found proofs – by Allah – which I have never heard before, nor read in a book. This, I have realized to be the aid from Allah, the good news of which was given to me by Rasul Allah (saws). (Extracted from Ibn ‘Asakir’s: Tabyin Kadhib al-Muftari fima Nusiba ila al-Imam Abu’l Hasan al- Ash’ari, pgs 51-52.)

He first wrote the Ashari Aqeedah to refute the minority heretical Mutazila sect that had plagued Islamic lands for some time, after this work was completed many of the followers turned away from the Sect which had a number of Different Khalifah’s (rulers) as its followers and it never recovered until eventually it ceased to exist. It’s significant that in the dream the prophet (saws) rebukes him for shunning theology, previously the scholars of Islam had left it alone to avoid controversy, but eventually saw it as a necessity to protect the religion from the heresies of the philosophers. The scholars of Islam all adopted this stance of Imam al Ashari on the matter after him, it was employed in this defensive manner that has been the position of Orthodox Islam right until our time.

Time in Islamic Theology (Aqeedah)

e8fe8d8cd49a160d6ee204f65cd74068“Behind them lies the intervening (Barzakh) barrier (stretching) to the day of their resurrection” (23:99-100). (It’s interesting that Allah says the barazh stretches to the day of judgment and not across space, this reference to time rather than location has significance in physics, relating to relativity, time (time dilation), the nature of the barrier (Barzakh) or field between the seen and unseen quantum world, and the nature of existence in that world.)

(Source: “Time in Islamic Kalam”)

Time is connected with change of state. Natural time units are taken from the periods of motion of astronomical objects like the Sun and Moon. It was realized by ancient scholars that time is very much connected to motion. In fact, time was considered to be a measure of motion.

In Islamic Kalam (Theology) time was regarded as being always related to space, space and time where considered to be relative measures. Both space and time were considered to be discrete. Some Muslim theologians and Mutakallimun detailed these aspects of time to such an extent that one can figure-out a whole theory of space and time. Their views concerning the relationship between space and time are in good agreement, conceptually, with contemporary  conception of relativistic time.

Two leading Islamic thinkers about time, where Ibn Hazm Al-Zahiri and Imam Al-Ghazali. Both are thinkers, who may be considered good representatives of Kalam (Theology), they refuted the notion of absolute space and absolute time, they always considered space and time to be inter-related. Imam Al-Ghazali talked specifically about the “time-dimension” and considered it to be on equal footing with spatial dimensions. In fact many of the properties of time in Islamic Kalam agree conceptually with the description of time in relativity theory. Furthermore, Islamic Kalam assumes that time (like space) came into being with the creation of the universe, and therefore they consider the question: ‘what was God doing before the creation of the universe?’ meaningless. Most of the Mutakallimun considered time (and space) to be discrete, being composed of finite, non-divisible moments called ‘Ana’. In accordance with the Islamic creed, the Mutakallimun considered Allah to be outside of (not bound or limited by) space and time (if your not bound by time you can see all Time at once, which is the perspective of that observer, hence Allah’s actions are not be bound by sequential events occurring in time).

The sources of Islamic Kalam are quite different from those of classical natural philosophy, including the philosophy of the Greeks. The Mutakallimun considered the Qur’an to be the prime source for their knowledge of the world, and accordingly they sought to achieve an understanding of the world based on the stipulations of the Qur’an. The Mutakallimun had the understanding that space has no meaning on its own.

Without having a body we cannot realize the existence of space. So too with time, which cannot be realized without the existence of motion which, in turn, needs a body to be affected.

According to Ibn Hazm, time is defined to be “the duration within which a particle would exist motionless or in motion, and if it (the time) is separated from the body, then the body will seize to exist and thus time will seize to exist too.”

In this definition, time is directly connected with motion and the existence of a body that is the subject of the motion. This is why Ibn Hazm repeatedly referred to this definition of time throughout his discussion of the creation of the world.

Ibn Hazm says, “Time is the duration through which an object stays at rest or in motion, and if the object is to be deprived of this

[rest or motion] then that object will cease to exist and time will cease to exist too. Since the object and the time both do exist, therefore they both co-exist”

(In modern physics time and space are woven together in what is called space-time, this was established after it was first theorized that large objects must affect the flow of time as the earth must drag on the fabric of space as it moves, this was then measured with satellites and it was found the earth does drags the fabric of space and time around it, hence time and space where established to be connected together).

Bodies themselves would not exist without motion; rest itself was considered by some of the Mutakallimun to be a kind of simultaneous motion in two opposite directions, two opposing forces. This is not unlike Newton’s First Law of Motion which states that a body at rest will remain at rest unless an outside force acts on it, and a body in motion at a constant velocity will remain in motion in a straight line unless acted upon by an outside force. Or the Normal Force (N, Fn) – The force between two solids in contact that prevents them from occupying the same space (sliding into each other).

Space and time were both considered to be dependent on the relative position of the observer, forward and backward, “above” and “below” are all considered to be spatial assignments that depend on the reference. Likewise “before” and “after” were considered to be relative.

Imam Al-Ghazali expressing his views on this point and said “All this is due to the inability of the estimative [faculty] to comprehend an existence that has a beginning except by supposing a (before) for it. This (before) from which the estimation does not detach itself, is believed to be a thing realized and existing, namely, time. This is similar to the inability of the estimation to suppose the finitude of body overhead, for example, except in terms of a surface that has an above, thereby imagining that beyond the world there is no place, either filled or void. Thus, if it is said that there is no “above” above the surface of the world and no distance more distant than it, the estimation holds back from acquiescing to it, just as if it is said that before the world’s existence there is no (before) which is realized in existence, [and the estimation] shies away from accepting it”

Imam Al-Ghazali treated space and time on an equal footing in respect of being both relative in extension, and being observer dependent, he said: “Similarly, it will be said that just as spatial extension is a concomitant of body; temporal extension is a concomitant of motion. And just as the proof for the finitude of the dimensions of the body prohibits affirming a spatial dimension beyond it, the proof for the finitude of motion at both ends prohibits affirming a temporal extension before it, even though the estimation clings to its imagining it and its supposing it, not desisting from [this]. There is no difference between temporal extension that in relation [to us] divides verbally into (before) and (after) and spatial extension that in relation [to us] divides into (above) and (below). If, then, it is legitimate to affirm an “above” that has no above, it is legitimate to affirm a (before) that has no real before, except an estimative imaginary [one] as with the (above)”

Discreteness of time was one main principle, among several others, that the Mutakallimun proposed as being a basic feature of the physical world. The discrete structure was applied to everything in nature. Specifically time was thought to be composed of tiny units, each of which was called “Ana”. The Mutakallimun, believing that the age of the universe was finite, assumed that the number of instants is denumerable. Ibn Hazm says: “And every period of time is composed of finite instants that have beginnings” While other Mutakallimun contributed to the concept of discrete time, Imam al Ghazali did not have much to say on this point, perhaps because overall he had little interest in the principle of discreteness.

Today physical time is considered to be continuous; however, the known laws of physics are valid only to a limit defined by the so-called Planck time of about 10^-43 seconds. Moreover, unifying quantum theory with general relativity may require some sort of time quantization.

The Mu’tazilite Al-Nazzam believed that motion on the microscopic level takes place in discrete jumps called “tafra”. It appears that Al-Nazzam was driven to this conclusion because although he believed in a non-discrete space, he believed in discrete time, so he had to explain motion by assuming that the particle is covering space through jumps or leaps. Some academics considered this understanding of al-Nazzam to be the oldest realization of a quantum motion, it was said: “In fact Al-Nazzam’s notion of leap, his designation of an analyzable inter-phenomenon, may be regarded as an early forerunner of Bohr’s conception of quantum jumps”

Quantum mechanics is establishing that time in the universe is born out entanglement, in this manner the existence of time is approaching discreetness in moments, attached to motion and action (“events”) of and in the universe.

The Prophet (saws) in the Hadith of Tabari said: If you wish to have this made clear, look to the circulation of the sphere alternately here and there. It is the circulation of Heaven and the circulation of all the stars together with it except those five. Their (referring it seems to heaven and stars) circulation today is what you see and that is their Prayer (Prayer is an act of obedience). Their circulation to the day of resurrection is as quick as the circulation of a mill because of the Dangers and tremors of the Day of Resurrection (so the end of the universe is tied to its movement, which has scientific implications). This is meant by Allah’s word: “On a day when the heaven sways to and fro and the mountains move. Woe on that day unto those who declare false (the Devine message). (52:9-11). (History of al Tabari vol 1, Pg 235-236).

In this way Islam holds (as entanglement suggests) the end of the universe is bound by its motion, and ultimately as the smallest being of consequence the actions of man will have a role in determining this, as Imam ibn Arabi said time will not end until there is no one left on earth who remembers Allah.

The Prophet (saws) said, “The Hour will not come until no-one on earth says ‘La ilaha illa Allah’.” (Ahmad.) It was also reported from Anas that the Prophet (saws) said: “The Hour will not come until no-one on earth says, ‘Allah, Allah’.” (Ahmad)

“For each person, there are angels in succession, before and behind him. They guard him by the Command of Allah,” (Al Ra’d 13:11).

Angels govern the universe from the unseen quantum world, the most abundant particle in the universe is the photon they are created from, and the electromagnetic force is one of the four fundamental forces in the universe, the relationship between the end of the universe and mans actions is understood in the prostration of the Angels to Adam (Mankind) directing there focus to what man is doing on earth. Before creating Adam (as), Allah informed the angels that He was going to create a human being, Allah says in Surah al-Baqarah (2: 34), “And (remember) when We said to the angels, ‘Prostrate yourselves before Adam.’ And they prostrated” (2: 34)

This prostration of the angels before Adam was out of obedience to the command of Allah. Qatadah commented, ‘The obedience was for Allah and the prostration was before Adam. Allah honored Adam (with their focus) and commanded the angels to prostrate before him.’ [at-Tabaree (1): 512]

Israfil is the angel who will blow the trumpet to begin the end of the universe this will not occur until Man has forgotten his creator entirely and the function the universe served has ended, the Qur’an says in chapter 69 (Al Haqqah) that the trumpet’s first blow will spread through out creation, it will have an effect of breaking the bonds (and forces) of matter until the sky is seen like molten brass and we will see the mountains passing in front of us like clouds of dust, the first blow of the trumpet will cause the destruction of everything, it is also called the “shout” in the Quran and is a sound that will travel through the universe, and in chapter 36 (Ya Sin) the second blow will begin the Day of Resurrection.

Is the Jawhar (Atom or smallest particle) Perpetual?

7c3eb687d04463a2213810fff3546a90(Source: Adopted from the work of Shaykh Abu Adam al-Naruji)

Question: I have a question regarding atomism that the Salafis are charging on us Sunnis. Do the Ashari really believe that the atom is perpetual in the sense that it itself is not an accident? So, this is one special object that exists, all else is accident? And this one special object is the common composition of everything? I know about there not being an infinitely indivisible particle, but my question is regarding its perpetuality. Should not this small special object “the atom” be an accident itself, as God would have to recreate it at every instant. So then everything in the universe is an accident according to the Asharis but based on the existence of this indivisible particle?

One of their academics says: “For the Asharites, the only perpetual object is the atom. The atom itself is created at a specific point in time, but after that time, it remains in creation until God wills otherwise.”

Answer: First of all never say “God would have to recreate it,” because God does not have to do anything. This is one of the most important principles of belief (Imam al Ghazali was quoted on this earlier, from his Incoherence of the Philosopher).

Second, using the word “atom” is a bit misleading. Asharis do not hold that the atom is the jawhar, the indivisible element of physical things.

As for your question: They are all things that have a beginning. “Accidents” or `arad, better translated as “incidental characteristics”, in my opinion, are simply attributes of the indivisible element (jawhar) that bodies are made of. None of them can exist without the other, but the indivisible elements are more lasting, because if there is a change in a body, then the `arad has changed, but the jawhars presumably remain the same. That is why they are longer lasting, but not perpetual in an absolute sense, only relative to the `arad. On the other hand, a jawhar cannot be without being either moving or still, so you cannot have a jawhar without `arad, because movement and stillness are `arad.

The academic appears to be a mushabbih, that is why he says things like “The atom itself is created at a specific point in time, but after that time, it remains in creation until Allah wills otherwise.” He imagines this is the Ashari position, because he seems to think that Allah, after  creating something, might just take a break from it and leave it until He wills for it to be no more. This is equivalent to the Judeo-Christian belief that the creator took a rest on the 7th day. He has the same position on causation. He says that once a thing has been given a power to cause things, to actually influence events, it can be left alone to do its own thing under supervision, in his opinion. Here are his exact words: “Rather, Allah has created each and every substance with intrinsic properties, and these properties may in fact effect other substances if Allah allows them to.” This belief is one of the origins of shirk, because it explicitly states that Allah’s power is shareable.

This belief in complete or partial rest comes from the methodology of thinking of Allah in terms of created things. The mushabbihah believe that Allah’s actions are sequential events: doing one thing and then another and another and so on (while Allah isn’t bound by time and the complexity of his actions, from the perspective of His existence, are not limited by the sequence of time). Actually though, Allah’s actions are not events, they do not start or stop, they are not sequential, they are not in time. They are without a how.

Asharis, on the contrary to what was proposed by the academic, believe that neither a change nor a lasting existence happens even for a moment without Allah having specified and created that. Nothing is ever acting without Allah having specified and created that act to the last detail. This is because every moment of existence for a created thing is only a possibility, so if Allah has not willed for its existence in the next moment, it will not exist.

The Indivisible Particle; (Islam on the smallest Particle in the Universe)

5f19148140fec0c9d257768b8da2c907(Source: Adopted from the work of Shaykh Abu Adam al-Naruji)

Ibn Taymiyyah disagreed with the Ash’aris about the divisibility of an atom and supported the view of the philosophers that the atom is indeed infinitely divisible contrary to the Ash’ari school, later in his life he changed his opinion and adopted the Ashari Madhhab which was witnessed by many and reported by his student Imam al Dhahabi in his biography of Imam al Ashari.

Today even school children know about the divisibility of atoms.

This silly claim is based on translating the term “jawhar” as equivalent to the term “atom” in physics. The jawhar in Ashari Aqeedah is the term for the indivisible particle that bodies are made of. It is not important what particle is the indivisible one, this is the concern of physics. Is it the quark, for example, or something else?

The scholars said that if bodies are divided into smaller and smaller parts, one will eventually reach a particle that is impossible to divide in the mind’s eye. Some of the Greek philosophers denied this, because it disagreed with their idea that the world is eternal.

Ahl al Sunnah (Sunni Islam) are currently under the accusation that they founded their belief on the existence of the indivisible elements of bodies (anything with a bulk – i.e. all physical things, material structures, organisms – anything that fills space). The accusers say that Sunni Scholars took this idea from Greek philosophy, and that the affirmation of such elements’ existence has been shown to be ridiculous by science. None of these claims have been backed by proof, and they are a poorly disguised attempt to baselessly attack Orthodox Islam. Wide spread belief in anthropomorphism (believing Allah has a body) and bigoted literalist sophistry, has made many engage in assaults on the people of tanzih

[1], Ahl al Sunnah wa al-Jamaa`ah. No punches against sound reason are spared these days, and all of this is done in the name of Allah’s religion. As has been narrated in a ḥadith about the last days before the coming of Al-Dajjal (Allah curse be upon him):

وَيَتَكَلَّمُ فِيهَا الرُّوَيْبِضَةُ

“And in those days the silly people will speak about matters of public importance.”[2]

The Basis for Knowing that There is an Indivisible Element is from the Quran, not Greek Philosophy

It is important to hold that the elements of this world are finite, and not infinite in number. This is the case whether it be moments of time, bodies or their attributes (such as movement, stillness and colour), because the Quran unequivocally implies that created things are finite:

وَمَا مِنْ غَائِبَةٍ فِي السَّمَاءِ وَالأَرْضِ إِلا فِي كِتَابٍ مُبِينٍ

Meaning: “there is nothing hidden of creation in the Heavens or the Earth that is not in a clear book.” [3]

Clearly, the book is not infinite in size. Therefore, the created things in the Heavens and the Earth are limited in number, and not infinitely many, otherwise there would be no room to record them all in a finite book.

Another ayah:

لا يَعْزُبُ عَنْهُ مِثْقَالُ ذَرَّةٍ فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَلا فِي الْأَرْضِ وَلا أَصْغَرُ مِنْ ذَلِكَ وَلا أَكْبَرُ إِلاّ فِي كِتَابٍ مُبِينٍ

Meaning: “(He is) the Knower of the Unseen. Not an atom’s (a general translation of the word “Zaratin”) weight, or less than that or greater, escapeth Him in the heavens or in the earth, but it is in a clear Record”(34:3)

Not what has the size of the smallest ant (as some translators have taken) in the Heavens or Earth, and nothing smaller or larger than that, and it is all recorded in a clear book.” [4] Allah referred the knowledge of what is the smallest thing back to himself, some translators assume the smallest thing here is referring to the smallest visible thing in the ancient world where by they are filling in the gaps and assuming what the most brilliant minds that lived more than a thousand years ago, knew of the universe, all the while, Ash’ari and Maturidi scholars have been discussing theoretical physics in there works and how these particles come into existence, particles they clearly stipulate have no magnitude or size until they are affected by the accident, showing there understanding of Quantum Mechanics and how particles form, was very advanced and they are not the simpleton’s the translators are.

This ayah states clearly that everything smaller than the smallest ant is recorded. If everything was infinitely divisible, then the elements that are smaller than the ant would not be a finite number. They would therefore not fit in a finite book.

Further to this is another ayah:

وأحْصَى كُلّ شَيْءٍ عَدَدا

Meaning: “He keepeth count of all things..” [5]

This ayah states that things are numbered. This means that they are not infinitely divisible, because that would make there quantity infinity.

Yet another ayah that affirms the finite existence of creation is:

وَكُلَّ شَيْءٍ أَحْصَيْنَاهُ كِتَابًا

Meaning: “the count of everything has been recorded in a book.” [6]

Al-Tabari stated regarding the meaning of this ayah that all things are counted and recorded in a book, that is, “its total number, amount, and value”[7] is always known. Clearly then, they are not infinite, because that would make all the numbers infinity, and not real numbers.

The indivisible element of bodies is called ‘Al-Jawhar Al-Fard’ (lit. the unique essence) in Arabic jargon, but that is just a name. This ‘Jawhar’ as the scholars defined is not the same as the atom (because it has electrons and protons as parts,) or even necessarily the quark (as it to has parts.)

The existence of the indivisible element is affirmed by scholarly ijma’, consensus of Islamic scholars.

The existence of the indivisible element of bodies, call it a ‘Jawhar’ or whatever you like, is affirmed by scholarly ijma’ consensus. Abu Manṣur ‘Abdul Qahir Al-Baghdadi (429 H) said in his book Usul al-Din[8]:

“Ahl al-Sunnah agreed by consensus that any jawhar is a part that is indivisible, and they declared as a blasphemer Al-Nazzam (a Mu’tazilite leader) and the philosophers who said that all parts are divisible into infinitely many parts. This is because it leads to saying that their parts are not known as a limited count by Allah, and this contradicts the saying of Allah:

وأحْصَى كُلّ شَيْءٍ عَدَدا

Meaning: “He knows the number of all things[9].” The nature of the discussion between the Scholars and the philosophers makes it clear they are speaking about matters smaller than the atom because we are referring to infinity.

In his book Al-Farqu Bayna Al-Firaq, Abu Mansur said:

“As for affirming the existence of the jawhar, the indivisible part (of anything with bulk): this is the saying of most (of those who claim to be) Muslims, except Al-Nazzam, for verily he claimed that there is no end to the parts of a single body, and this is the saying of most of the philosophers. If this was true, then the mountain would not be bigger than the mustard seed…. because what does not have a finite existence, is not larger than something else that does not have finite existence (i.e. infinity=infinity, note that we are speaking of real existence, not potential existence, such as what is to be in the future)….

…. As for Al-Nazzam, it is said to him: If you believe in the Quran, then there is the saying of Allah:

وأحْصَى كُلّ شَيْءٍ عَدَدا

Meaning: He knows the number of all things.[10], so if the parts of all the kinds of creation were not limited (at all times), then they would not be known as a number.”[11]

This narration of ijma’ (consensus) must be taken seriously, because its proof is clear, and the narrator, ‘Abdul Qahir ibn Ṭahir Al-Baghdadi Al-Tamimi, Abu Mansur, (429 AH/ 1037 AD) was the head of the scholars of his time. The Major historian of his time Imam Al-Dhahabi (673-748 AH/ 1274-1348 AD) described him in his book Siyar ‘A’lam Al-Nubala’[12] as: “the great, outstanding, and encyclopedic scholar”…. “He used to teach 17 different subjects and his brilliance became the source for proverbs.” Al-Dhahabi said that he would have liked to write a separate, more complete article about him. He quoted Abu ‘Uthman Al-Ṣabuni[13] (373-449 AH/ 983-1057 AD) saying: “Abu Mansur is by scholarly consensus counted among the heads of the scholars of belief and the methodology of jurisprudence, as well as a front figure of Islam.”

From the above we can safely assume that the idea of the indivisible element, the Jawhar, is from the Quran and is affirmed by ‘ijma’ consensus. Therefore, it is not taken from Greek Philosophy.

The Importance of the Indivisible Element

As stated by Al-Taftazani and others, the knowledge about the indivisible part is important when fighting those who believe that there is something other than Allah that is without a beginning. He said:

“If someone asks: ‘Is there any particular benefit to this disagreement (proving the existence of the Jawhar, and refuting those who deny it)?’ Our answer: ‘in proving the existence of the Jawhar, there is salvation from a lot of the darkness of the philosophers, like the affirmation of their concepts of eternal matter, and of forms, which lead to the belief that the world is eternal and beginning-less[14].’”

The Real Nature of The Indivisible Element is Unknown to Us

Note that what is mentioned in scholarly works about the nature of the indivisible element, is not essential with regards to the Islamic belief. In fact, its nature is unknown. Some scholars such as Fakhr al-Dīn Al-Rāzī, felt confident enough to talk about it, and did.

Needless to say, the scholars of old differed widely in their views, with the limited mathematics and instruments they had. Many Ash’aris, such as Al-Zarakshi, contended that to speak of its nature is a mistake, because everything we observe is divisible. Others ventured to do it. Their purpose was to attack the philosophers on their own premises in geometry and other fields of science. They wanted to refute every argument that the philosophers presented.

They did not do this with the intention of making these arguments the core of the Islamic belief, they merely wanted to show that even based upon their own premises the philosophers were wrong. Many of these proofs are not of the unequivocal type, unlike the proofs for the jawhar’s existence, though they can be helpful in developing one’s conceptualization and finding out just how limited we are. Today, needless to say, many of these arguments are no longer needed, as they are no longer used by the opponent.

It is very important to understand then, that the weakness of some of the proofs which are based on geometry are not evidence for doubt in the indivisible element. The Prophet (saws) mentions that “Allah hath Seventy Thousand Veils of Light and Darkness: were He to withdraw their curtain, then would the splendours of His Aspect surely consume everyone who apprehended Him with his sight.”(Mishqat al Anwar, by Imam al Ghzali) keeping in mind that space and time are interwoven this means at some point this divisibility of particles ends and the splendor of Allah’s aspect can be known. These veils maybe pointing towards something outside of space and time which the Quantum world leads to. It is interesting the prophet (saws) mentioned veils of Darkness and Light because Black is thought of as the absence of light and not an object in it self permeating space on the same level as Light, in our time we have devised theories regarding Dark Matter and Dark Energy.

If we where to keep in mind how matter forms from the smallest particle to the objects and creatures we know of in life, then the different objects and creatures in the universe are the veils of form, of Allah’s attributes:

“Then He fashioned him and breathed into him of His spirit.” (32:7-9),  “And when We said to the angels, ‘Prostrate yourselves before Adam.’ And they prostrated” (2:34), He said: O Iblis! What hindereth thee from falling prostrate before that which I have created with both My hands? Art thou too proud or art thou of the high exalted?(38:75), “Then his Lord chose Adam, relented towards him and guided him.” (20:122), “Indeed, we offered the Trust to the heavens and the earth and the mountains, and they declined to bear it and feared it; but man [undertook to] bear it. Indeed, he was unjust and ignorant” (of it). (33:72), “I created the jinn and mankind only so that they might worship Me.” (51:56), “We have removed the veil from your eyes, and so your vision will now be sharp and strong”.(on this day of judgment) (50:22), “By time, Indeed, mankind is in loss, Except for those who have believed and (have) done righteous deeds and advised each other to truth and advised each other to patience.” (Surah al-Asr, 103)

Hence the proof of the indivisible particles existence, is firmly established by the Quran, scholarly ijma’ (consensus), and sound reasoning.

Conclusion

In conclusion, to say that the idea of the indivisible element is ridiculous is to contradict what the ayahs mentioned above necessarily imply. It is also a claim that contradicts scholarly ijma’ consensus. Moreover, it is an opinion that is not backed by scientific findings. It is finally a failure to think logically, for how would a scientific experiment show with certainty that an element is infinitely divisible, when dividing it in such a case would never end? Clearly then, science has not shown the idea of the Jawhar to be ridiculous because you can not make a claim about something you haven’t disproven yet. We are still coming to terms with the Higgs Boson and wondering if that particle itself is devisable and if so how much further does this goes on.

If the accusation of Greek philosophy still has not been settled in some peoples minds, then this  is the equivalent of accusing Scholars of taking science from the Greeks in the general sense, and that is the basis for prohibiting it, not the nature of the matter, i.e whether the thing is correct or incorrect. To refute anything it first has to be studied and judged on its merits only if it wrong is it rejected, and to refute anything you have to quote it and find a solution to the problem, simplistic comparisons between Greek works and Islamic works without the study of the context for these works is not accurate.

At this point we should apply these warped principle in our lifetime as well and ban all modern science that came from the lands outside of Islam as haram and heresy, simply because a muslim scholar did not conceive it.

This is the reality of the accusation leveled at the Ashari Scholars, it is an ill thought out accusation of Kufr and bigotry in disguise, from a hypocritical perspective revolving around physics, that no one would be free of if applied today.

I hope that the modern attack on the belief in the indivisible element was not a sign for the coming of something far worse and the spreading of kufr.

References

[1] Tanzīh is the Sunni belief that Allāh does not resemble His creation, that He is not in a place or in time, because He existed before He created them and He did not change. Al-Ṭaḥāwī stated (in {brackets}): {Allāh is above} the status of {having limits, extremes, corners, limbs or instruments.} {The six directions} up, down, front, back, left and right {do not contain Him} because that would make Him {like all created things}. The opposite of tanzīh is anthropomorphism, which is the belief that Allāh has attributes similar to that of creation. The most prominent of such beliefs today is the belief that Allāh is above the ‘Arsh (throne) in the literal sense. They promote this idea to the general public by adding “but we don’t know how.” This does not help, because having this belief entails believing that Allāh is something adjacent to the throne, and that He therefore has a limit. This belief is blasphemous by the consensus of the Salaf, and all reasonable human beings.

[2] Fatḥ al-Bārī, 13/84, [3] Sūrat al-Naml, 75, [4] Sūrat Saba’, 3, [5] Al-Jinn, 28

[6] Al-Naba’, 29, [7] Jāmi’ al-Bayān Fī Ta’wīl al-Qur’ān, [8] Uṣūl al-Dīn, 36

[9] Al-Naba’, 29, [10] Al-Naba’, 29, [11] Al-Farqu Bayna Al-Firāq, 354

[12] 17/572

[13] Abū ‘Uthmān Al-Ṣābūnī, who said this, is one of the greatest scholars of Islām and among Sunnis he is known as ‘Shaykh Al-Islām’ – the Shaykh of Islām. Al-Subkī, in his “The Levels of the Shāfi’ī Scholars,” quotes a number of scholars praising Al-Ṣābūnī. He stated that Al-Bayhaqī said, “Verily Al-Ṣābūnī is in reality the Imām of the Muslims and in truth the Shaykh of Islām. All the people of his time are humbled by his state of religion, leadership, sound beliefs, amount of knowledge, and his commitment to the way of the Salaf generation (the first three generations, or first three centuries of Muslims) (1/223-224).”

[14] Sharḥ al-‘Aqā’id Al-Nasafiyyah, 36

Islamic Intellectual History: Atomistic Conception of The Universe

4544d137624640874976089e152ac517(Source: Adopted from “Daqiq al-Kalam” and “The Atomistic Conception of Nature in Ash’arite Theology” (with some corrections to both) and “Kalam and Islam”.)

In Islamic intellectual history, we encounter several conceptions of nature, which differ from each other because they arose out of different perspectives of viewing and understanding the nature of the universe in different regions of the world through out history. These different conceptions arose in an Islamic Empire which spanned from central and north Africa all the way to China over a period of 1400 years which spoke many languages. The most well-known of these, and also the earliest to have been formulated, was the theory associated with the theologians (mutakallimun) of the Ash’ari school (Madhhab of Aqeedah). It has been often referred to as the atomistic conception of the universe, since it emphasizes the discontinuous and atomistic character of matter, space, and time.

In Islam there are Madhabs of Fiqh (school of thought relating to Law), Madhabs of Aqeedah (relating to creed and theology) and Madhabs of Tasawwuf (relating to Ihsan, Human perfection and development), this is the same devision of knowledge in religion outlined in the hadith of Jirbil (as). Scholars choose from different schools between them to specialize in these different areas of knowledge.

In Arabic “Kalam” means speech (or a collection of words). However it also means “dialogue” and this is the meaning which was intended for Islamic Kalam.

Classically Kalam was considered to form the foundation of jurisprudence, or “Fiqh”, which constitute the base for Islamic “Shari’a”. Kalam dealt with problems related to the Divine attributes, the resurrection of the dead, questions related to the Divine knowledge, will and power, the question of the creation or the Eternity of the World and the question of Causality, these subjects lead to the question of Man’s Free Will.

Kalam investigated the same basic concepts that are the subjects of present-day physics, like space, time, matter, force, speed, heat, colors, smells (gases) and the like. Although the question of the universe was dealt with by the scholars of Aqeedah, this is unlike modern times where a person specialized in one area of knowledge. The Islamic Islamic scholars whose works stood out the most and where relied upon where the most brilliant in the Islamic Ummah, they reached the highest levels of scholarship and where given the title of Mujtahid, they where polymaths (a person whose expertise spans a significant number of different subjects) mastering many fields of Science such as Physic, Mathematics, Law and Language.

If we inspected the requirements for there qualifications hardily any scholar alive today could match there capacity for learning. For example The Scholars who where qualified to write commentaries on the Quran (Tafsir) said it can only be done by those who have mastered nine fields of learning, they then have a right to undertake it.

These are lexicography (lugha), the derivation of words (ishtiqaq), Arabic Grammar (naḥw), Qur’an recitation (qiraʾa), biographies (siyar), Hadith (the narration’s of the prophet), the principles of jurisprudence (uṣul al fiqh), the science of the legal rulings (ʿilm-l aḥkam, Fiqh), the science of transactions and interactions (muʿamalat), and some have added a tenth, the science of bestowal (mawhiba), which is the science of Maarifa from Allah, “Be aware of Allah, and Allah Himself will teach you” (2:282).

To put that into a modern perspective what is meant by mastered is that you would require an equivalent of a Phd in each of these 10 fields to be Qualified to make a commentary (Tafsir) on the Quran. This Standard was established by Scholars who where at genius level in their IQ (intelligence), capacity for understanding and we can be certain what is also meant by mastered is they need to have memorized voluminous texts in each field of study, along with at least 100,000 narration’s in the science of Hadith, which means they also need to have near perfect memory and recall.

The title Hujat al Islam (The Proof of Islam) is given to scholars who have memorized 300,000 Ahadith, that is the narrations along with there chains of transmission, each person in the chain constitutes a single account of that narration, because in terms of historicity (historical authenticity) in some cases the wording of a person earlier in the chain may differ than the wording of a latter person in the chain so this difference was also studied and was part of the science surrounding the Historicity of Islamic texts.

This is relevant because modern translators who usual only have a qualification in philosophy or a related field have failed to understand the scientific sources in Islamic texts and have simplified it down to a matter of copying and pasting previous texts. Imam al Ghzali for example was given the title Hujat al Islam (The Proof of Islam) although it may have been for a reason other than hadith specialization, other titles exist such as Shaykh al Islam and Mujadid, the last one in particular is the most significant title earned by a scholar through his work and achievements. A Mujadid means he was the scholar of his era, the most significant scholar in the past hundred years, Imam al Ghazali and Imam Suyuti both earned that title.

This isn’t to say they where absolutely accurate, they relied on the science of their times, but limitations in equipment should not be considered as deficiency in relation to modern academics.

The resources of Kalam are quite different from those of the classical natural philosophy including the philosophy of the Greeks. Mutakallimun considered the Qur’an as the prime source for their knowledge about the world, and accordingly they intended to set-up to understand the world according to the stipulations of the Qur’an. This is the main reason why we find that Kalam concepts are different in meaning and implications from their counter part in the Greek and Indian philosophy.

For example: the Qur’an stipulates that the world was created by Allah some finite time in the past, accordingly the Scholars developed an entire body of knowledge regarding creation of the world and generated their own understanding of substances (Jawaher) and the accidents (A’radh, equivalent to the fundamental forces in quantum physics). If Allah designed the world according to his own will, having full control over the world, nature was understood as being composed of unstable and ever changing events. This requirement generated the concept of “accidents” causing change in the world, discreteness of natural structures applies not only to material bodies but to space, time, motion, energy (heat) and all other properties of matter.

The Scholars said that all entities in the world are composed of a finite number of a fundamental components called Jawhar جوهر (substance) that are non-divisible (referring in the general sense to the smallest non devisable particle) and have no parts. The Jawhar is rather an abstract entity that does not acquire its physical properties unless occupied by a character called ‘Aradh عرض (accident). These accidents are ever-changing characters. This was expressed by saying .العرض لايبقى زمانين أو آنين that no accident can persist for two successive moments (times). Discreteness (of time) applies not only to material bodies but to space, time, motion, energy (heat) and all other properties of matter.

Because Allah is The absolutely able Creator of the world and because He is alive and ever acting قيوم , therefore the world has to be re-created (sustained at) every moment (in these discrete times). The Scholars proposed that the world is in a state of continuous creation, i.e., that once it is created in these discrete (very finite) moments it is immediately annihilated, meaning it is dependent on a sustainer.

The annihilation is understood crudely by many people and stated in simple terms (which i have left in quoting these articles, even though it contains errors in representing it), this is because most translations are done by people qualified in philosophy and not physics, while historically Islamic Theology is the domain of theoretical physics because logically that was the area of knowledge that dealt with the universe and the sciences where not compartmentalized as they are today which is why Polymaths in our time are extremely few.

So a theory of physics based on the Quran and Sunnah becomes a philosophy according to modern translators, while according to Stephen Hawking and Imam al Ghazali philosophy is dead. The ultimate result is the accusation that revelation is philosophy, something entirely Kufr, no philosopher ever claimed the source of his knowledge was other than himself, his knowledge would no longer be philosophy otherwise. Scholars like Imam Ibn Arabi and Imam al Ghazali spoke at length about Maarifa which Allah mentions several times in the Quran as a source of knowledge, Imam Malik ibn Anas (after whom the Maliki madhhab is named) may Allah bless him, said: “Knowledge is not cleverness of intellect as many people believe it to be, but it is the light that Allah bestows upon a human being’s heart”. So the label of philosophy has become an accusation of Kufr leveled at these scholars and the prophet (saws).

If we use the four fundamental forces as an example, if one of them ceased to exist matter as we know it would not exist, similarly if the Higgs field did not exist which gives quantum particles Mass, that dictate the motion of these particles in relation to the expansion of the universe, and this in turn allows the fundamental forces to exist that impact our world, most matter in the universe would disintegrate and fall apart.

The scholars used the Quran as a source for their inspiration and understanding the world, just like the Quran describes at the blowing of the trumpet if what is holding matter together stops holding it, the sky would seem like molten brass or tanned leather and we would see the mountains like clouds of dust passing by. “And thou wilt see the mountains, which

[now] thou deemest so firm, pass away as clouds pass away: a work of Allah, who has ordered all things to perfection! Verily, He is fully aware of all that you do!”(27:88). Perfection here means completion, in this context it is the completeness of the mountains construction, Allah is referring to its most finite element in relation to His knowledge of it.

Allah set the image firm in the scholars minds from the first days of Islam, if the mountains are made of Jawhar (substances), standing firm as large rocks, they will pass like clouds (of particles) when Allah orders the trumpet blown, therefor matter is being held together by a force that will no longer exist at that moment.

Imam Suyuti the Mujadid of his time and an Ash’ari wrote in his tafsir (commentary) to verse 27:88 “And you see the mountains, you notice them, at the moment of the Blast, supposing them to be still, stationary in their place, because of their tremendous size, while they drift like passing clouds, [like the drifting of the] rain when it is blown around by the wind, in other words, they [the mountains] will be drifting in like manner until they [eventually] fall to the ground, whereby they are flattened before becoming like [tufts of] ‘wool’ [cf. Q. 101:5] and then ‘scattered dust’ [cf. Q. 56:6]”(Tafsir al Jalalayn, 27:88).

The mountains which are firm in the ground will first be uprooted as dust (gravity and the fundamental forces no longer exist), then they will begin to float (“when the hills are uprooted from their spots”, Tanwir al Miqbas min Tafsir Ibn Abbas: 56:6) then pass like the clouds of “scattered dust” (56:6). The idea of matter itself being made of small particles is firmly established in the Quran, and that these substances in there current form will one day no longer exist in this manner and change will occur was made vividly clear.

If time is discrete, something not all theologians spoke about or agreed with, then Allah’s act of sustaining it from moment to moment means that it is sustained for a moment then when that is finished that moment needs to be sustained again, (time is born from entanglement, and entanglement occurs because of motion) there is no limit to how finite a time this occurs on and it isn’t to say Allah is not also acting in these moments but he decreed we have free will and choices in life, meaning he also responds to our actions in the Universe which is illustrated by the verse “You did not throw, when you threw, but Allah threw” (8:17).

The issue with some translations referring to the world as being annihilated and recreated isn’t with the process, but the image of the world not existing then existing, it is annihilated and then recreated, even though this is mentioned as being a finite process the words used to describe it conjure in the mind the world being destroyed then recreated which is a false image, what is being referred to here is something impossible to perceive and time is clearly and apparently fluid and continuous, meaning no scholar ever witnessed a moment of un-creation to speak of the matter in these vivid terms.

In fact Allah in the Quran challenges us to see otherwise, “Blessed is He in Whose hand is the Sovereignty (of the universe), and, He is Able to do all things. Who hath created life and death that He may try which of you is best in conduct; and He is the Mighty, the Forgiving, Who hath created seven heavens in harmony. Thou (Muhammad) canst see no fault (flaw) in the Beneficent One’s creation; then look again: Canst thou see any rifts?(67:1-3)

The scholars used science to explain the Quran, not philosophy. In his work, Risalah fi istihsan al-khaud fi’l-kalam, Imam al-Ash’ari replied to questions regarding motion, rest, body accident, atom, and space by saying that “the Prophet (saws) wasn’t unaware of all these things. Moreover, one can find the general principles (usul) underlying these physical issues and problems explicitly mentioned in the Quran and the hadiths”.

The Scholars associated this action of re-creation after annihilation with Aradh (the accident) rather than with the Jawhar (the substance). But once we know that the Jawhar cannot exist without the Aradh, the accident (Aradh) can be thought of as the forces sustaining the Jawhar (substance), this is equivalent to the four fundamental forces of the universe without which quantum particles could also not exist as described by modern physics.

By such a process they attributed the act of the universe being sustained, to the forces acting on the substances (Jawhar), and thus through this manner Allah is the continuous sustainer of the Universe. The discussions in Imam al Ashari’s lifetime were not merely scientific, but involved issues that clearly touched upon religious beliefs, they necessitated the active participation of the religious scholars. And answers to these problems where deduced from the general principles contained in the Quran and the Hadiths.

Imam al-Ashari quotes both the Quran and Ahadith to establish that Allah asks man to study these signs in the universe. For example, he quotes the following Quranic passage to show that there is a scriptural basis for the definition of Aradh (accident) as “that which cannot endure, but perishes in the second instant of its coming-to-be”, Allah says “Ye look for the transient things (arad) of this world, but Allah looketh to the Hereafter (8:67).

The Ash’ari’s called the existence of indivisible particles “al-juz’ alladhi lam yatajazza’”, literally meaning “the part that cannot be divided” (which came to be inaccurately termed atom in english). These particles are the most fundamental units that could exist, and out of which the whole world is created.

The First major characteristic of the Ash’ari atoms (Jawhar) is that they are devoid of size or magnitude (kaam), and are completely homogeneous like the Higgs boson, in fact a closer look at there description will show that the word atom is inadequate, because there are types and it is impossible to think water is made from the same atoms as dirt indicating the general nature of the discussion which they understood in more complex terms. Being devoid of size or magnitude in other words means, they are entities without length or breadth, but which combine to form bodies possessing dimensions, this bears a very close resemblance to quantum particles as we know them today behaving as waves, or particles existing in the field. They therefore differ from the atoms of Leucippus and Democritus or those of Epicurus in Greek philosophy, which are always presented as having magnitude.

The Second main characteristic of the Ash’ari atoms is that they are determinate or finite in number. Thus, in opposition to all schools of Greek atomists, who believed in the infinite divisibility of matter, and who maintained that atoms are infinite in number, the Ash’ari rejected the infinity of atoms on the basis of the Quranic verse: ‘And He counteth all things by number’ (Chapter LXXII, verse 28), meaning at some point this divisibility will stop and “the part that cannot be divided” is the smallest particle (Jawhar).

The Third important characteristic of the Ash’ ari atoms is that they are perishable by nature. The Ash’ari’s maintain that the atom (Jawhar) cannot endure two instants of time. At every moment of time the atoms (Jawhar) come into being, and pass out of existence (This is not unlike Quantum field theory, all particles are excitations of fields and the Higgs Boson was observed by exciting the Higgs field, the particle was observed momentarily then it went back into the field, In the words of Imam al-Baqillani, the accident “perishes in the second instant of its coming-to-be.”). Each atoms duration (baqa’) is instantaneous. Its momentary existence is made possible ultimately through Allah’s supervention upon it through the accident (Aradh) of duration, which, like all other accidents, is perishable.

When conceptualizing the universe the Ash’ari’s “atomize” matter, space, and time, as a result of which the universe becomes a domain of separate, concrete entities which are independent of each other, there is no connection between one moment of their existence and the next.

The idea of atomism (Atomic nature of the universe) itself had a long history in both Eastern and Western thought. Out of the different philosophical and religious molds in which this idea has been conceived throughout that long history, have arisen such a wide variety of its formulations that, content wise, no single definition can adequately express and comprehend them.

From the classical atomic theory of Greek philosophical speculation, to fifth-century atomism of Indian religious sects, from the atomism of Kalam (Theology) in ninth-century Islam to that of the European Renaissance and to the atomic theory of modern science, one fundamental idea, and the only one, that has remained common to all these theories is the idea of the finitude of the divisibility of particles constituting the material world. This is assuming that those variants which convey the idea of the divisibility of substance ad infinitum (continues divisibility) are excluded, otherwise, they have nothing in common.

By similitude the relevance of Greek Philosophy to Orthodox Islamic intellectual thought is as significant to Islamic history as someone finding an isolated tribe in the middle of the Amazon who had not left their lands and introduced the idea that the world is vast, except in this instance Allah had already spoken about the natural phenomena in the Universe and the smallest particle in existence in both the Quran and Sunnah, it nudged in some directions the understanding of what was already there and after careful consideration the eventual outright rejection of its particulars occurred.

The Greek philosophers them self relied on the the revelations of persian prophets, Plato for instance often quotes the persian Prophet Zoroaster (the majus in the Quran).

Just like it has been theorized and cant be establish which came first the “Chicken or the Egg” we cant establish the exact minimal extent of that influence to overall Orthodox Islam, muslim scholars where not interested in philosophy or philosophical thought they where interested in science and the scientific nature of existence and outright rejected such methods until it was deemed necessary to refute them with the emergence of the Mutazila and other heretical sects.

For the first few hundred years of Islam, Orthodox Islam fought the heresies of the Philosophers, ensuring that the identity of Islam was well defined by producing works outlining its Creed (Aqeedah), Theology, Law (Fiqh), History, Language and much more, which was done by its scholars throughout its lands. Imam al Ash’ari did this from the central Lands of Islam while Imam Maturidi, the other main Islamic school of Aqeedah is named after him, did this from central Asia and there where many others.

Muslim Scholars where well aware of the divisions that was to occur, there is the famous hadith, The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) stood among us and said: “Those who came before you of the people of the Book split into seventy-two sects, and this ummah will split into seventy-three: seventy-two (will be) in Hell and one in Paradise, and that is the jamaa’ah (main body of Muslims).”(Abu Dawood), the Main body of Islam as we know it today is Sunni Islam, which comprises roughly 90% of the Muslim population, the devision being over the very things the philosophers liked to debate over, Aqeedah (creed) and the nature of Allah and existence, about which they held heretical views.

Imam al Ghazali one of Islam’s major theologians wrote the work “The Incoherence of the Philosophers” which dealt a blow to Philosophy in Islamic lands which historically it never recovered from. It is an insult to one of Histories Greatest minds to relabel his works as philosophy as has been the case by modern academics. What they wrongly perceived as philosophy was the science that existed in his time and Imam al Ghazali was careful to separate the two. Beyond specific scholars in history, in various parts of the Islamic world adopting some of there views, we are only interested in understanding the atomic theory of kalam as one of several theories of nature formulated by the Ullumah.

The atomistic theory of nature is Islamic insofar as it has a Quranic basis, it was based not only upon the teachings of the Quran concerning nature, but also specific theological perspectives of the revealed Book and science as it was understood in the day. There are other theological interpretations of the Quran, which have been used by other intellectual schools like the Maturidi school of Aqeedah.

For over a thousand years Orthodox Islam was defined in the follwoing manner, when the Imam of the late Shafi‘i school of Law (Madhhab, meaning the entire school relied on his works) Imam Ibn Hajr al-Haytami was asked for a fatwa identifying as-hab al-bida or heretics, he answered that they were “those who contravene Muslim orthodoxy and consensus (Ahl al-Sunna wa al-Jama‘a): the followers of Sheikh Abul Hasan al-Ash‘ari and Abu Mansur al-Maturidi, the two Imams of Ahl al-Sunna” (al-Fatawa al-hadithiyya (c00, 280).

It shouldn’t be surprising that Islamic Orthodoxy, Sunni Islam, or Ahl al Sunnah wal jama’ah is defined by its Aqeedah (creed) and not it’s Fiqh (Laws). A person can make mistakes in Law and he would be committing a sin but if he makes mistakes in his Aqeedah (creed) that can take him out Islam entirely, short of this are the heretical sects which just fell short of being outside of Islam altogether. In fact the famous hadith of the 73 sects “My ummah will be divided into seventy three sects. All of them will be in the Fire except one”, (Muslim, no.976), the Ulluma defined by the Aqeedah of these groups not there fiqh, and the one group is Sunni Islam.

There are many different groups having different Fiqh beliefs based on the four madhhabs but the number of groups that varied in Aqeedah numbered 73, all have already come in history, and this is identified by the content of what they believed and not just their names alone.

Islamic theology is based on an ethical rather than speculative imperative, this point is worth emphasizing, in essential terms, the debate between kalam (Theology) and falsafah (Philosophy) was not a debate between two world views, one Islamic the other un-Islamic or less Islamic, it was a debate between two particular perspectives interpreting the Islamic sacred Texts one failed to arrive at sound conclusions and was deemed a flawed methodology.

Moreover, “belief” means holding something to be true, not merely believing what one’s forefathers or group believe, such that if they handed down something else, one would believe that instead. That “belief” is blind imitation without reference to truth or falsity, it is not belief at all. Allah specifically condemns those who reject Islam out of such reasons, by saying:

“When they are told: ‘Come to what Allah has revealed, and to the Messenger,’ they say, ‘It suffices us what we found our forefathers upon’—But what if their forefathers knew nothing, and were not guided?” (5:104).

In short, Islamic Theology exists because belief in Islam demands three things:

(1) to define the contents of faith;

(2) to show that it is possible for the mind to accept, not be absurd or inconsistent;

(3) and to give reasons to be personally convinced of it.

One of the first groups in recorded history to speak about the theory of atomism in Islam was the heretical sect the Mu’tazili, during the first half of the third(AH)/ninth(CE) century, although it is possible that the idea had already been discussed earlier, early islamic scholarship was largely an oral tradition which changed with the spread of writing tools.

However, it is quite certain that by the middle of the third/ninth century, atomism had become firmly established in the theological circles of Islam as a theory which commended itself as the antithesis of Aristotelianism. According to an account of early kalam atomism given by Abu Hasan al-Ash’ ari (d.330/941), the founder of the Ash’ari school of Theology (kalam), in his Maqalat al-Islamiyyin, that early ninth-century Mu’tazilite figures as Abu’l-Hudhail al-’ Allaf (d. 226/840), al-Iskafi (d.241/855), Mu’mar ibn ‘Abbad al-Sulami (d.228/842), Hisham al -Fuwati (a contemporary of Mu’ ammar), and ‘Abbad ibn Sulayman (d. 250/864) all accepted the atomic theory in one form or another.

This atomism theory by the Mu’tazilite theologians was later rejected, refined and extensively developed by the Ash’arite school, this being one aspect of its teachings, especially by Abu Bakr al-Baqillani (d.403/1013). After the fourth-tenth century it was the atomism of Ash’arite Theology which flourished in Islam, having as its exponents such famous names as al-Ghazzali and Fakhr al-Din Razi (d.606/1209).

Ash’ari Theology has remained to this day the dominant Sunni school of theology and the other being the Maturidi school.

The science of kalam has its roots in the earliest theological and political debates in the Islamic community concerning such problems as free will and predestination, the question of whether the Quran is created or uncreated, the relation of faith to works, the definition of a believer, and many more. All these issues arose out of specific internal factors and developments, already existing within the community, that were both religious and political in nature.

These debates led to the emergence, during the first(AH)/seventh (CE) century, of various sectarian groups with distinct, definable views which distinguished them from the majority of the community, and which thus placed them in the extreme fringes of the community (Ummah). The most famous of these groups were the Murji’ites, Qadarites, and Khawarij.

It was out of these early theological trends and manifestations that the first systematic theological school emerged, namely, the Heretical Mu ‘tazilah.

Islamic theology had to combat a number of external factors, the first was the theological attacks against the very tenets of Islamic faith, carried out by religious groups such as the Jews, Christians, and Manichaeans, as well as the Materialists, who were all intellectually armed with the tools of Greek logic. Another factor was the introduction of Greek philosophical ideas into the community through translations of Greek works into Arabic.

The nature of the new challenge was twofold, one methodological, the other doctrinal. At the methodological level the challenge involved finding rational answers to the fundamental problem of relationship between revelation and reason, of which the question of legitimacy regarding the use of logic or dialectical methods in theological discussions, was just one aspect. At the doctrinal level, the challenge involved the problem of identifying and formulating authentic criteria of orthodoxy in the face of conflicting claims to “Islamicity”.

The challenge facing Abul Hasan al-Ash‘ari and Abu Mansur al-Maturidi was to: (1) define the tenets of faith of Islam and refute innovation; (2) to show that this faith was acceptable to the mind and not absurd or inconsistent; and (3) to give proofs that personally convinced the believer of it. Though not originally obligatory itself, kalam became so when these aims could not be accomplished for the Muslim polity without it, in view of the Islamic legal principle that “whatever the obligatory cannot be accomplished without, becomes itself obligatory.”

Imam al Ashari was the first to succeeded in safeguarding the identity of Orthodox Islam, for the first 30 years of his life he had been a Mutazili himself, which he learnt from his uncle a prominent Mutazili scholar, then upon seeing the prophet (saws) in a dream who instructed him to teach his sunnah, he left the group and began systematically dissecting its arguments exposing its weakness and faults, this conversion to Orthodox Islam, the Mutazilah never recovered from and eventually ceased to exist.

Imam al-Baqillani, a student of Imam al-Ash’ari, was most responsible for its refinement and detailed formulation. As regards the other Ash’arite doctrines, apart from Imam al-Baqillani, it was Imam al-Ghazzali and also Imam Fakhr al-Din Razi, who further elaborated on them to produce a more refined exposition.

Although the Ash’ari’s accepted the necessity of rationalization of faith, they were generally opposed to the rational methodology and speculation of the philosophers (falasifah), revelation is explained by rational thought rational thought does not produce revelation. So there was an order of precedence that had to be maintained to safeguard the meaning of the original message in the Quran from distortion, to which they employed the various islamic sciences in formulating their conclusions.

In one respects, the Ash’ rites possessed an independent spirit of intellectualism. Unlike the philosophers, they were not bound to any particular school of Greek philosophy. This spirit was productive of some of the severest criticism of Aristotelian physics. Consequently, the Ash’ari’s were able to develop many original ideas pertaining to the sciences of the universe, particularly in the theory of atomism.

According to Imam al Ghazali, kalam, theology could not be identified with the Aqeedah (creed) of Islam itself, but rather was what protected it from heresy and change. He wrote about his long experience in studying kalam (Theology) in a number of places in his Ihya’ ‘ulum al-din (Revival of Religious Science), one of them just after his beautiful ‘Aqida al-Qudsiyya or “Jerusalem Creed” (Aqeedah he wrote in Jerusalem). After mentioning the words of Imam Shafi‘i, Malik, Ahmad, and Sufyan al-Thawri, he mentioned that (speculative) kalam, theology, is unlawful—by which they meant the Mu‘tazilite school of their times.

Imam al Ghazali gives his own opinion on discursive theology, saying:

“There is benefit and harm in it. As to its benefit, it is lawful or recommended or obligatory whenever it is beneficial, according to the circumstances. As to its harm, it is unlawful whenever and for whomever it is harmful”…

“As for its benefit, it might be supposed that it is to reveal truths and know them as they truly are. And how farfetched! Kalam theology is simply unable to fulfill this noble aim, and it probably flounders and misguides more than it discovers or reveals. If you had heard these words from a hadith scholar or literalist, you might think, “People are enemies of what they are ignorant of.” So hear them instead from someone steeped in kalam theology, who left it after mastering it in depth and penetrating into it as far as any scholar can, and who then went on to specialize in closely related fields, before realizing that access to the realities of true knowledge was barred from this path. By my life, theology is not bereft of revealing and defining the truth and clarifying some issues, but it does so rarely, and about things that are already clear and almost plain before learning its details”.

“Rather, it has one single benefit, namely guarding the ordinary man’s faith we have just outlined [the Jerusalem Creed] and defending it by argument from being shaken by those who would change it with heresies”.

In this and other passages of his works, Ihya ulum al-din, al-Munqidh min al-dalal, and Faysal al-tafriqa which summarize his life experience with kalam theology, Imam al Ghazali distinguishes between several things. The first is ‘ilm al-Aqa’id or the knowledge of the basic tenets of faith, which we have called above “personal theology,” and which he deems beneficial. The second is what we have called “discursive theology,” or kalam properly speaking, the use of rational arguments to defeat heretics who would confuse common people about tenets of faith, Imam al Ghazali believed this is valid and obligatory, but only to the extent needed.

The third we may call “speculative theology,” which is philosophical reasoning from first principles about God, man, and being, to discover by deduction and inference the way things really are, this Imam al Ghazali regards as impossible for kalam to do.

As for the role of kalam in defending Islam from heresies, Jahm and the Mu‘tazilites are certainly less of a threat to orthodox today than scientism, the reduction of all truth to statements about quantities and empirical facts. The real challenge to religion today is the mythic power of science to theologize its experimental method, and imply that since it has not discovered God, He must not exist which itself is against the scientific method since declaring something impossible on the basis of no evidence is not science but speculation.

The heart of traditional kalam theology is that—after the shahada “there is no deity but Allah and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah,” and after acknowledging Allah’s infinite perfections and transcendence above any imperfection—it is obligatory for every Muslim to know what is (a) necessarily true, (b) impossible, or (c) possible to affirm of both Allah and the prophets (upon whom be peace). These three categories traditionally subsume some fifty tenets of faith.

(a) The twenty attributes necessarily true of Allah are His (1) existence; (2) not beginning; (3) not ending; (4) self-subsistence, meaning not needing any place or determinant to exist; (5) dissimilarity to created things; (6) uniqueness, meaning having no partner (sharik) in His entity, attributes, or actions; (7) omnipotent power; (8) will; (9) knowledge; (10) life; (11) hearing; (12) sight; (13) speech; such that He is (14) almighty; (15) all-willing; (16) all-knowing; (17) living; (18) all-hearing; (19) all-seeing; (20) and speaking—through His attributes of power, will, knowledge, life, hearing, sight, and speech, not merely through His being.

(b) The twenty attributes necessarily impossible of Allah (21–40) are the opposites of the previous twenty, such as nonexistence, beginning, ending, and so on.

(c) The one attribute merely possible of Allah (41) is that He may create or destroy any possible thing.

The attributes of the prophets (upon whom be peace) similarly fall under the three headings:

(a) The four attributes necessarily true of the prophets (42–45) are telling the truth, keeping their trust, conveying to mankind everything they were ordered to, and intelligence.

(b) The four attributes necessarily impossible of them (46–49) are the opposites of the previous four, namely lying, treachery, concealing what they were ordered to reveal, and feeblemindedness .

(c) The one attribute possible of them (50) is any human state that does not detract from their rank, such as eating, sleeping, marrying, and illnesses not repellant to others; although Allah protected them from every offensive physical trait and everything unbecoming them, keeping them from both lesser sins and enormities, before their prophethood and thereafter.

When one reflects on these fifty fundamental tenets of faith, which students memorized over the centuries, it is not difficult to understand why Ash‘ari-Maturidi kalam was identified with Islamic orthodoxy for over a millennium; namely, they are the tenets of the Qur’an and Sunna.

The Sources of Modern Science

ed8d16cfce6ca2594f94b949bcc07a6c(Source: adopted from the research paper “Ash’arite’s atomistic conception of the physical world: A restatement”, with some clarifications added.)

Modern philosophy has become the interpreter of science, it organizes the results of the natural and social sciences into a world view. This interpretation in turn determines direction which science is to take in its study of nature. It is this interpretation of the statements and general conclusions of science, and the direction of science along these lines suggested by the interpretation, that must be subjected to critical evaluation, as they pose for us today the most profound problems that have confronted us generally in the course of our religious and intellectual history.

Science is not value-free (opinion free), instead it is value-laden, thus, it is critical to examine modern science’s premises, general conclusions and the interpretation based on that conclusion so that the problems faced by modern science are not being imported to the minds of Muslims.

Generally there are at least three main different views of the world throughout the history of Western Science, through which each of these views arrived at different outlook on the nature and existence of God. Those views belong to: (i) Aristotelian physics, (ii) modern philosophy and classical physics and (iii) the contemporary physics drawn from the theory of relativity and quantum theory.

It should be stated that the body of knowledge concerned with the ultimate reality of things is called Ontology, the body of knowledge concerned with the nature of the Universe is called Cosmology, and the existence of God  is called Theology.

In Aristotelian physics, God still has a place in his theory of motion. He is the unmoved mover or primary and final cause that causes motion in anything. However, Aristotle’s God is like a craftsman, all motion He causes are eternal. Therefore, the world is eternal, there is no beginning and end, it had always existed and would always exist.

Next is modern philosophy which is the interpreter of science and one of the most important figures who has contributed to the modern philosophical discourse was René Descartes (d. 1650). In his Discours de la Méthode (1637), Descartes declared that he had found the “laws which God has put into nature”. God has impressed the ideas of them on the human mind in such a way, that their universal validity cannot be doubted. He also explained that God, after the creation of matter, let nature develop from chaos in accordance to these laws (he set the ball in motion, as apposed to Islam where He is a constant agent in the universe). Even if God had created several worlds the “laws of nature” would be valid in all of them.

As for classical physics, it can be seen from the works of Isaac Newton (d.1727) especially on the laws of gravitation and motion in which he believed that the discovery by extracting phenomena and reformulating it into the mathematical structure is the way of knowing the creation of cosmos by God. These laws which are immutable and became the laws of nature before the advent of quantum mechanics. For Newton, the world of matter was a world possessing mathematical characteristics fundamentally. It was composed ultimately of absolutely hard, indestructible particles, equipped with the same characteristics which had now become familiar under the category of primary qualities. He also asserts that all changes in nature are to regarded as separations, associations and motions of these permanent atoms

The last one is contemporary physics that was influenced by the birth of quantum theory and the theory of relativity. Quantum theory considers the nature of the subatomic particles. There are many interpretations when it comes to the nature of the subatomic world in quantum theory and the most well- accepted interpretation among the physicist is the Copenhagen interpretation. The thing to be most concerned about in Quantum Theory is the question regarding the nature of reality which can be understood in the following statements; 1) “there is no reality”, 2) “that the physicist “creates” the reality”, 3) “that there are many realities”, 4) “that the reality is spiritual” and so forth. Briefly, the Copenhagen interpretation is bound to the view that there is no reality behind quantum phenomena, meaning the observations and data. All that is required according to this view is (i) a set of mathematical formulae and (ii) a set of experimental data obtained in the laboratory.

On the question of the nature of reality, the Copenhagen interpretation neglects the understanding of the nature of reality, it limits what is possible to what is conceived and verified in a Laboratory, which is a fine safety net scientifically but not when results are expressed in the real world where “value” and philosophy is added to them, then this restrictions set upon the value of these results is forgotten.

The external world is real and independent of what the mind can conceive in a laboratory. In fact, existence itself has many levels which (from what we have understood) can be explained by relativity of objects in the subatomic world and this physical world is one of the many levels of existence (we don’t mean dimensions) and this world has a connection with the higher order of existence.

(For example Light has higher and lower spectrums which we don’t see, Angels are created from Light which is an electromagnetic wave and they are larger in size than Humans so they are not quantum themselves even though they are made of quantum matter in that state, meaning like the molecules and compounds our bodies are made of, they move at the speed of light or slower or faster, the Theory of Relativity, Time Dilation and Quantum Theory explains much about them. We should add that the Islamic understanding of there nature is far more complex and detailed than other religious traditions, regarding which, academically the historicity of these texts can not be established and is in question).

On the question of the importance to hold this atomistic conception of the physical world, we quote the saying of Sa’d al-Din al-Taftazani (d. 1390) (On Islamic scholars studying the quantum universe):

If the question is raised whether there is any benefit resulting from this position

[of affirming the atomic minimal part] which is different (from that of the Philosophers), we reply that there is. In establishing the pure atom we escape many of the obscurities of the Philosophers, such as the positing (put forward as fact) of primary matter (hayuli) and form (sūrah) which leads to the eternity of the world, the denial of the resurrection of the body, and many of the fundamental laws of measurement (al-handasah), upon which obscurities rests the continual motion of the heavenly spheres; and also the denial of the rending (al-kharq, tear apart, the severance of the bonds holding matter) of them and their being coalesced together again (al-ilti’am, come together to form one mass or whole, meaning the tearing apart of the bonds of matter in the universe and there being put back together as a whole in the next life).(end quote)

As we have seen, the Aristotelian system has brought us into the idea of the eternity of the world. Islamicly this is a rejected idea because this physical world originated from nothing into something. We have to also disagree with the view that this world is originated but it has it’s own (independent) laws, namely the laws of nature. This is the view of Descartes and Newton that has no room for miracles or extra phenomenal events that happen and everything can be determined by mathematical formulation, some things Allah brings into creation by his command of “Be” and the thing is. Newton has three famous Laws of motion, while accurate these are laws of observation and cant be absolute to all possible situations, his third Law is “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction” this cant be necessarily true for everything but is a good “rule of thumb”.

To Descartes and Newton, God is like a watchmaker, His role is confined only to the creation of the universe and then the universe operates according to their own laws like a vast machine. This limits the nature of causality where if we follow the principle of the laws of nature, the connection between cause and effect must be necessary. Islam does not totally reject this principle but has a much broader and comprehensive understanding of causality stated by Imam al-Ghazali when he refuted Ibn Sina on his views regarding the eternity of the world in his treatise Tahafut al- falasifa [The Incoherence of the Philosophers].

He rejected this view while considering the existence of miracles, unexplained events happened in this physical world such as the fire not burning Ibrahim (saws). For instance, if we place cotton near fire, we cannot say that the fire will always cause the cotton to catch fire, for we allow the possibility of the occurrence of contact without burning, and we allow as possible the occurrence of the cotton’s transformation into burnt ashes without contact with the fire. Because of the existence of a possible situation in which fire does not burn when it is supposed to burn, this occurred to Ibrahim (as) when he was thrown into the fire by Nimrod and similarly to his son when the knife would not cut him, Allah did not simply command Ibrahim to stop, Allah stopped the knife from cutting while it was at his throat.

In reality God ultimately creates the ability for fire to burn and for the cotton to be burnt and for the knife to cut and for the thing to be cut. The connection between what is habitually believed to be a cause and what is habitually believed to be an effect is not necessary.

For [in the case of] everything that will happen, its occurrence (like being burnt) is a necessary consequence of its cause (the fire), once the cause is realized. We do not know what will happen in the future only because we do not know all the causes [of the future effects], will Allah always allow the knife to cut. If we were to know all the causes, we would know all the effects. For once we know, for example, that fire has made contact with cotton at a specific time, we would know the burning of the cotton. And once we know that an individual will eat, we would know that he will be satiated but between certainties there is possibility and doubt of the outcome.

In other words, God creates everything in separate existence and He is the one who makes a relation between the one thing and the other. It only seems like their connection is always necessary, like the fire must burn the cotton, because of the limitation of our senses. This is God’s customary way of acting, what we call the sunnat of Allah, that the fire will burn. Thus, Islamicly there is no problem whether the phenomenal events in this world are determinism or indeterminism because we affirm both.

It is important to speak of the view that the world is eternal because this conception is still flowing in the veins of modern cosmology. Even though the form may differ but the premises and conclusion is still the same. For example, the theory of the formation of the universe—big bounce theory which is the combination of the big bang and big crunch theories ultimately creates the endless cycle of universe formation in which the universe expands from the point of singularity until it collapses and this process is repeated infinitely. Instead of the universe being originated and eventually annihilated, the theory views that the universe is the same as the laws of conservation of energy i.e. it cannot be created nor destroyed but it only changes to another new cycle of the universe. This notion is rejected in Islam because once it is destroyed all that will be left is Allah and we will revert to the same manner we where in, in our non existence until Allah brings about a new creation from the same nothing that existed before this universe. Energy can go back into nothing, because the term energy is a generalization, there are different forms of energy in the universe and all can be reduced into there constituent parts the reality is energy comes from motion (expansion of the universe) without it, it cant exist.

Islam also rejects the idea of an infinite universe, infinitely divisible particles cannot exist because ultimately this will compel us to conclude that God has no role in this world. The idea of the infinite is inadmissible for God because he has determined everything according to His measure, thus everything is finite and has limits.

Or Contact us via email

Go to Top